A 123-acre data center could soon rise along East John Street in Matthews, but many residents aren’t convinced it belongs there.
At a packed community meeting Thursday night, developers with Project Accelerate fielded dozens of questions about water use, energy demand, noise and taxes. While the team promised the project would bring the town millions in tax revenue and operate under strict limits, most residents who spoke opposed it, raising concerns about safety, costs and how the project could change Matthews.
“We don’t need this,” one longtime resident told the crowd. “We have to ask ourselves, can we build a data center on this lot? Sure. Is that what we want? I don’t think so.”
Here are six things to know about the proposed Matthews data center:
Some nearby residents fear the project would tower over their backyards.
“It’s 80 feet in the air,” one man said. “You’ll be able to see that from a long distance.”
The project site covers 123 acres on East John Street, bordered by Interstate 485 and a rail line, near an existing Duke Energy substation, said Drew Nations, CEO of Engineered Land Solutions, the developer of the proposed project.
Developers are pitching five buildings for the site, each described as two stories tall but capped at 80 feet, shorter than the 120-foot power towers already standing nearby. Their plan shows 80-foot setbacks and 40-foot tree buffers, along with a multi-use path along East John Street. Right now the land is zoned for residential use and could hold around 300 homes if built that way. Instead, the team is asking Matthews to rezone it for industrial use, with parameters specific to the data center.
The development team emphasized its closed-loop cooling system before questions even began, calling it “a responsible, cutting-edge way” to run a data center.
The system would be filled once, then recirculated, with daily water needs limited to uses like bathrooms and landscaping, Nations said.
But some residents weren’t convinced. One woman argued that as equipment is replaced and expanded, the facility “is going to keep drawing more water,” despite promises otherwise. Others pressed about potential leaks, runoff and the chemicals used to keep water clean. Developers responded that detection mechanisms, shut-off valves and staff on site 24/7 would limit risks.
Several residents said their top concern was increased electricity bills as a result of the large center.
The developers said the project would require about 600 megawatts, which one resident called “massive.” Nations said developers would pay for all substation upgrades themselves, with no costs passed to Duke Energy customers.
“Whether we turn the lights on or off, we’re paying for that power,” Nations said. “That’s part of our rate structure.”
Nations pointed to Duke Energy’s recently published n, which projects about a 2.1% annual increase in customer rates regardless of whether the Matthews project is built.
Nations also said Duke Energy requires a 17% reserve margin, meaning it must generate more power than it distributes to ensure reliability and prevent outages.
So far, no one. The developers told the crowd they won’t announce an end user until after rezoning is decided, leaving some residents uneasy. Seeing logos of Apple, Meta and Wells Fargo on presentation slides, one resident, Danielle Frain Benham, asked if the project’s mission was simply to “make these conglomerates even bigger.”
The team replied the examples were meant to illustrate industries like banking, health care, and streaming, that rely on digital infrastructure. They said the rezoning must come first before a tenant signs on.
“We all have cell phones in our pockets right now. We’re all participating in this digital economy, whether it’s work, streaming, or education,” Nations said.
Noise may prove the hardest sell. Consultants acknowledged parts of the site already exceed Matthews’ 60-decibel limit because of nearby interstate traffic, wind and train horns. They said the campus would use barriers, enclosures and building placement to stay under the town’s threshold at all hours.
But some neighbors dismissed the assurances.
“Sixty dB – I’m going to have to try to sleep with that,” one said.
Another likened the hum to a bell ringing constantly: “You’d get used to it, but it would destroy much of the environment we live in today.”
Nothing has been approved by the town yet. Developers held another community meeting in July, followed by a September public hearing. Another community meeting is scheduled for Oct. 9 and a public hearing is scheduled for Oct. 13.