BLYTHEWOOD — Scout Motors is pointing the finger at its subcontractors for alleged damages to the home of a local elderly couple.
William Shives, 92, and Barbara Shives, 84, filed suit against Richland County and the carmaker in August, alleging that construction work at the 1,100-acre Scout Motors plant forced them to move from their home and 24-acre property directly adjacent to the site.
What did Scout say?
Scout filed a response on Oct. 2, claiming that responsibility for any damages falls to the manufacturer’s subcontractors working on the site, rather than the Volkswagen-backed car maker.
Scout named three contractors it said worked on the site as third-party defendants in the case — Evans General Contractors, LLC, Elevate Drilling & Blasting, LLC and Strack.
Scout claims Evans was charged with organizing and overseeing “certain activities” on the construction site, while Elevate and Strack were involved in blasting operations.
The subcontractors “owed a duty” to Scout “that all work performed by them would be performed in a careful, diligent, and workmanlike manner and that any materials and/or services designed, supplied, or sold by them for use on the project would comply with instructions, building code, and/or plans,“ the carmaker’s lawyers wrote in the Oct. 2 filing.
“The damages alleged by Plaintiffs, if any, were due solely to the actions of the Third-Party Defendants and were not caused by any act or omission on the part of Defendant,” the filing reads.
Scout is asking the Richland County Court to dismiss the claims against the company and hold the subcontractors liable for any damages awarded to the Shives, as well as Scout’s “cost of investigating and defending this claim,” according to the filing.
"Evans General Contractors is aware of the filing,” Evans spokesperson Lauren Rigau said in an Oct. 7 statement. “As a matter of policy, we do not comment on pending litigation. Evans takes seriously its responsibilities to the communities where we work."
The Post and Courier Columbia was unable to immediately reach representatives for the remaining two subcontractors on Oct. 6.
Citing the pending litigation, a Scout spokesperson declined to confirm whether the three contractors are still employed by the company at the construction site, when they last were or if the work they were charged with is still ongoing.
What are the Shives suing for?
The couple claimed in their lawsuit that during the construction of the Scout plant:
The Shiveses made Scout Motors aware of the issues on the property, they allege. A contractor from the plant site delivered a load of gravel after the driveway was washed away, but the condition was not remedied, the couple said in the lawsuit.
They have since moved out of their home, according to court filings.
“They have been driven out of the home they expected to live in for the rest of their lives, and now they have been forced to purchase a smaller house away from the place and the people they have known,” the Shives’ lawyer wrote in court filings.
William and Barbara Shives are seeking compensation for the physical damage to their property, as well as to cover the reduction of the property’s value and their enjoyment of the property, plus pre-judgment interest and attorney’s fees, according to court filings.
Previous issues at Scout
Scout expects to employ 5,000 people and produce 200,000 vehicles a year at the Blythewood plant once the facility is completed in 2028. The state Legislature passed a record $1.3 billion incentives package to bring the plant to South Carolina in 2023.
The state Legislature is allowing the state Department of Transportation and Department of Natural Resources to pull from leftover state funds originally intended to pay off debts in order to cover $150 million in cost overruns at the Scout site.
Gov. Henry McMaster, a longtime proponent of the Scout project, vetoed a provision that would have held that money until the state can wrap up an investigation into the overruns in December.
State regulators also fined Richland County $3 million for allegedly allowing sediment and other pollutants to escape from the construction site into nearby waterways in May 2025.
The county and its contractors have jurisdiction over the site clearing for the factory as part of the incentives deal created to draw in the car manufacturer.
Richland County “has fully satisfied the payment schedule established by the Department of Environmental Services consent order,” a county spokesperson said on Oct. 6.
Half of the fines paid by the county will be reimbursed by the state, while the remainder will be footed by “various third parties,” county spokesperson Keywa Henderson said in a statement.
No county taxpayer funds will be spent on the fines, Henderson said. The statement did not identify the “various third parties” mentioned.
“Richland County is proud of the collaborative work undertaken with the State, with Scout Motors, and with our independent third-party engineering firm to bring this matter to a successful conclusion,” Henderson said. “We remain committed to supporting Scout Motors, the largest economic development investment in our County’s history, and to upholding the highest standards of environmental compliance as the project moves forward.”