There are also potential economic and policy impacts for South Pasadena utility customers. The city is served by Southern California Edison’s power grid, meaning any major financial hit to SCE or new safety mandates could eventually be felt on our monthly electric bills.
Listen to this article
Southern California Edison (SCE) and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) are facing a wave of litigation in the aftermath of two catastrophic wildfires that struck Los Angeles County in January 2025.
The Eaton Fire in the San Gabriel foothills claimed a reported 17 lives and destroyed thousands of structures, marking one of the worst wildfire disasters in recent Southern California history. Local governments and residents have filed lawsuits alleging negligence by the utilities, even as investigations into the fires’ exact causes continue.
The unfolding legal battle highlights growing concerns over wildfire liability and public safety in California, including in communities like South Pasadena that sit on the periphery of these disasters.
Lawsuits Accuse Utilities of Negligence in Deadly Fires
In early March, Los Angeles County and the cities of Pasadena and Sierra Madre joined forces to sue SCE and its parent company, Edison International, over the Eaton Fire. Their complaints seek hundreds of millions of dollars to cover firefighting costs and damage to public infrastructure after the fire ripped through more than 14,000 acres in Altadena and northeast Pasadena, as sited in the PasadenaNow News.
BusinessWire “The lawsuits seek to hold Southern California Edison responsible for this devastating fire and recover the critical infrastructure and taxpayer resources that the fire destroyed,” said in Ed Diab, an attorney representing the public entities. The suits cite eyewitness accounts and photographs showing flames erupting at the base of an SCE transmission tower as ferocious Santa Ana winds drove the blaze’s rapid spread.
These government actions come on top of dozens of private lawsuits by homeowners and wildfire victims – litigation so extensive that a Los Angeles Superior Court judge convened a case management hearing on March 17 to coordinate the claims. Plaintiffs allege SCE’s power lines sparked the inferno, pointing to evidence of an electrical arc on the evening of January 7 that ignited dry brush below.
One class-action complaint even contends that a long-decommissioned transmission tower was mistakenly re-energized during the windstorm, causing a surge and spark that triggered the fire, a moment purportedly captured on a gas station’s security camera.
Meanwhile, across town, LADWP is under legal fire for a different kind of alleged negligence during the Palisades Fire. According to NBC4 LA, In January, a group of Pacific Palisades residents sued the City of Los Angeles and LADWP, accusing them of disastrously mismanaging the municipal water system as the brush fire tore through canyon communities. That initial suit, filed on behalf of 23 homeowners, has grown to include 25 additional plaintiffs as of early March.
The residents’ complaint alleges that LADWP’s infrastructure was woefully unprepared for an urban wildfire: an empty 117-million-gallon reservoir above Pacific Palisades and inadequate water pressure left firefighters without enough water at crucial moments.
As flames encroached on homes, some hydrants ran dry, forcing desperate measures. “The lawsuit alleges LADWP designed a water supply system that would not have enough water pressure to fight an urban wildfire,” NBC Los Angeles reported, noting the Santa Ynez reservoir had been drained for repairs since February 2024. The result, plaintiffs say, was a fast-moving blaze that might have been contained sooner if not for these failures. LADWP has since commissioned an independent engineer to investigate whether the empty reservoir contributed to the firefighting breakdown.
The utility declined to comment on the pending litigation, but the City of Los Angeles faces mounting pressure as residents seek accountability for the disaster that left at least nine people dead and some 5,000 structures in ruins in the Palisades area.
Utility Responses and Ongoing Investigations
SCE has responded to the litigation and allegations with careful public statements while official investigations remain underway. The utility denies that its equipment was definitively at fault for the Eaton Fire at this stage.
In a statement issued just two days after the fire ignited, SCE said a preliminary analysis showed “no interruptions or electrical or operational anomalies in the 12 hours prior to the fire’s reported start time until more than one hour after” the blaze began. In other words, SCE claimed its grid sensors detected nothing unusual on the lines at the time of ignition.
However, as more evidence emerged, the company’s tone shifted. One month later, Edison International’s CEO Pedro Pizarro acknowledged that external video footage had suggested a possible link between SCE’s hardware and the Eaton Fire, and he vowed to “explore every possibility” in determining the cause.
“While we do not yet know what caused the Eaton wildfire, [SCE] is…including the possibility that SCE’s equipment was involved,” Pizarro said in a February 6 report to the California Public Utilities Commission. He added that the company had been “fully engaged since the start of the fires in supporting the broader emergency response, containment, recovery and investigation efforts.”
Echoing that conciliatory tone, an SCE spokesperson emphasized, “Our hearts are with the communities affected by the wildfires in Southern California,” even as the company pledged to address the lawsuits through the legal process. SCE says it is reviewing all claims and, given that investigators have not yet determined an official ignition source, the utility has refrained from admitting liability. No cause has been formally assigned to either the Eaton or Palisades fires to date, and both incidents are still under joint agency investigation.
The court proceedings are advancing even as fact-finding continues. On March 14, attorneys representing hundreds of Eaton Fire victims from across Los Angeles County formed a 45-firm steering committee to coordinate their cases, which are expected to be consolidated for efficiency.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Laura Seigle approved a protective order to facilitate discovery, allowing plaintiffs’ lawyers to begin evidence gathering in cooperation with SCE’s legal team. The day before this article’s publication, a case management conference was held in downtown Los Angeles to set ground rules and timelines for the complex litigation. Judges have also moved to preserve any forensic evidence related to the fires: on January 21, a judge ordered SCE to safeguard data, damaged equipment, and other materials potentially tied to the Eaton Fire’s origin, after concerns were raised that the company might dispose of critical evidence.
Impacts and Implications for South Pasadena
South Pasadena may lie outside the burn zones of the Eaton and Palisades fires, but the community is not untouched by the consequences. As an incorporated city within Los Angeles County – and a neighbor to the City of Pasadena – South Pasadena shares in both the costs and lessons of these disasters.
Verdugo Group firefighters, which includes South Pasadena, were among the first on the scene in Altadena when the Eaton Fire erupted, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department ultimately devoted nearly all possible resources to battle the blaze and protect surrounding communities.
There are also potential economic and policy impacts for South Pasadena utility customers. The city is served by Southern California Edison’s power grid, meaning any major financial hit to SCE or new safety mandates could eventually be felt on our monthly electric bills.
If SCE is found liable and forced to pay massive damages (beyond what its insurance and the state fund cover), the company may seek rate increases from the California Public Utilities Commission to recover some costs – an outcome that would spread the pain to all SCE ratepayers, including those in South Pasadena.
As the legal battles unfold in the courts, South Pasadena stakeholders will be watching closely. The outcome will help determine who pays for the devastation of January 2025 and how we guard against the next wind-driven blaze that could ignite in our hills.
In the meantime, the tragedies of the Eaton and Palisades fires serve as a sobering reminder that accountability and preparedness go hand in hand in an era when wildfire risk has become a year-round reality.
PasadenaNow.com News Contributed to the content of this report
South Pasadena Monterey Hills Fire, minutes before the Eaton Fire Started