MARY ESTHER — While city residents would retain “Mary Esther” in their mailing addresses, they would experience numerous changes if the city eventually dissolves and becomes a part of unincorporated Okaloosa County.
That point made by city and county officials highlighted a Monday night public meeting about the potential dissolution. The session took place at the First Baptist Church of Mary Esther, which was filled with more than 150 residents.
County Administrator John Hofstad told the large audience that he and the County Commission have not taken a position on the possible dissolution.
“It is a city of Mary Esther decision,” Hofstad said. “We’re here to support you either way.”
Joining him in leading the discussion were County Attorney Lynn Hoshihara and Mary Esther’s city manager and city attorney, as well as current City Council members.
Citing problems such as ballooning property taxes and water and sewer rates, three council candidates in the March 8 city election — Benny Bennington, April Sutton and Douglas White — support a potential referendum in November that would allow city voters to decide whether Mary Esther remains a city.
Earlier:Will Mary Esther remain a city? Three council candidates want to make 'real changes.'
But even if the referendum occurs and voters approve dissolving the city, “It’s not like you show up the next day (after the possible referendum election) and turn the lights off at City Hall,” Hofstad said.
The dissolution process, which is rare and must follow state requirements, is an extensive one that involves the transfer of services, the resolution of accumulated debt and many other issues, he said.
Hoshihara said to provide a seamless transition, about 95% of the details on the city possibly becoming a county-managed unincorporated area would be done ahead of the potential referendum election.
City Manager Jared Cobb told the audience that neither he nor other city officials who attended the session support dissolving the city.
“A dissolution plan would not go into effect unless and until voters approve a referendum on dissolution,” City Attorney Hayward Dykes said.
March 8 elections:Here are the candidates for races in Cinco Bayou, Mary Esther and Valparaiso
No votes or decisions were made at Monday's meeting, at which Hofstad said he would help provide a very broad overview of what would be involved in the potential dissolution.
For example, he said while the county funds the overall Sheriff’s Office budget, it does not pay for the enhanced level of service that Mary Esther receives from the Sheriff's Office and would not do so if the city becomes unincorporated.
Currently, a Sheriff’s Office captain and two deputies are dedicated to providing law enforcement to the city. Councilman Larry Carter wondered whether Mary Esther could, as a potential unincorporated community, continue to pay extra in order to keep its enhanced level of service.
“We don’t do that anywhere else currently” in the county, Hofstad said.
According to a presentation led by Cobb, if the city dissolves it would receive the same level of service from the Sheriff’s Office as any other unincorporated area.
Addressing another concern, Hofstad noted that Mary Esther currently receives fire protection services from the Ocean City-Wright Fire Control District.
He said while the county does not provide any such services, many unincorporated areas receive them from independent fire control districts.
Fire protection services for Mary Esther likely would continue to be provided by Ocean City-Wright if the city dissolves, according to city officials.
If the potential referendum on dissolution gains traction after the March 8 election, county officials would work with Mary Esther officials to determine the costs and levels of fire protection services for the area, Hofstad said.
He said that evaluation would be part of extensive investigations and cost comparisons that would be done before the possible referendum in November.
If the city dissolves, the county would provide water and sewer services, but needed capital upgrades likely would be paid for by former Mary Esther residents, Hofstad said.
The county would have to investigate the current and potential costs of the city’s water and sewer systems and determine Mary Esther’s priorities, Hofstad said. Cobb said that currently, the city does not have a direct connection to the county’s sewer system.
The future of Mary Esther’s library also was a top item discussed Monday.
Currently, the county library cooperative pays for about a quarter of the city library’s annual operational costs and Mary Esther taxpayers pay the rest.
“We would have to figure out (the library’s annual funding scenario) if Mary Esther dissolves,” Hofstad said.
While the city's Maintenance Department maintains Jesse Rogers Memorial Cemetery, its future maintenance method would have to be determined if the city dissolves. Hofstad said churches or organizations maintain most cemeteries in the unincorporated areas.
Addressing other matters, Hofstad said the county would continue to use Mary Esther’s portion of local option gas tax money to help maintain roads in Mary Esther and would keep using the city’s allocation of half-cent sales tax money for road, stormwater and public safety projects in Mary Esther if the city dissolves.
Also, “If you live in the unincorporated part of the county, you pay 0.299 in additional mills (besides the county’s 3.8308 general fund millage rate) for park and stormwater operations,” Hofstad said.
Mary Esther’s current millage rate is almost 5.03, or about $503 per $100,000 of assessed value.
According to information from Cobb, the Panhandle Animal Welfare Society would continue to provide animal control services for Mary Esther and the county would handle Mary Esther’s code enforcement and planning and zoning matters if the city dissolves.