SOCORRO – Since 2020, residents along and near Bauman Road have lived in fear that they may lose their homes and land to make way for a new road.
This week, they got word that their years of organizing appears to have paid off, with the Socorro city government identifying a new preferred route for a much-needed arterial road project to connect residents in the growing city to Interstate 10.
“For five years, a lot of our neighbors got sick. A lot of our neighbors have expressed their concern in tears,” said Dr. Lorena Silvestre-Tobias, who grew up in a house on Bauman Road that her father built with his own hands more than 40 years ago. She has been one of the leaders of efforts to encourage Socorro to find another route.
The city of Socorro had a public meeting Wednesday night to outline the new preferred route for a project called Arterial 1, which is southeast of the Bauman Road area that was originally selected as the preferred route. The meeting was at Robert R. Rojas Elementary School on Bauman Road, which is adjacent to the original preferred route.
The Socorro City Council, faced with intense community opposition, backed away from the Bauman Road site in September 2023 and restarted the complex environmental studies and community outreach required for major road projects.
“We had a significant group of residents during that time who were not happy with that route coming through Bauman. They were unsure of a potential displacement of properties and eminent domain, which is something that I’m not very fond of, to be quite frank,” said Socorro Mayor Rudy Cruz Jr. “I think that they raised enough awareness on the table there for this council to vote no against that route and have the engineers go back and seek another route.”
See Also
After further study, the new preferred route was laid out at the public meeting. Dozens of residents walked through a variety of posters and maps that were explained by city officials and engineers.
The new preferred route would displace 12 residential and one commercial structure, according to project documents, far less than the dozens of homes that Bauman Road residents feared might have needed to be cleared under the original proposal.
The project would create a new four-lane road connecting Socorro Road to Interstate 10. Residents of fast-growing Socorro, many of whom work or go to school in El Paso, currently lack a direct route from their homes to I-10.
“Let’s keep in mind that Socorro is an old farming community, and a lot of these main arteries are old farm roads, and they were never built to sustain the amount of traffic that we’re seeing right now. We still have these two-lane farm roads,” Cruz said in an interview with El Paso Matters.
The Bauman Road area was part of thousands of colonias – subdivisions that were built without water and sewer service – that proliferated along the U.S.-Mexico border in the mid-20th century. The El Paso Interreligious Sponsoring Organization and its sister organizations led campaigns that eventually brought those services to Bauman Estates and other colonias along the border.
EPISO also assisted the Bauman residents in organizing opposition to the road expansion through their neighborhood.
Socorro reincorporated in 1985, and the city quickly began growing around the colonias.
Socorro’s population grew from 23,043 in the 1990 census to 34,306 in the 2020 census. By 2024, the city had added another 4,300 residents, accounting for more than 40% of El Paso County’s population growth since the last census, according to Census Bureau estimates.
The Arterial 1 project still has a number of steps before completion, including environmental reports, engineering design, more public hearings, securing funding, and acquiring right of way. Construction wouldn’t begin until 2028 on the current timeline.
Socorro is required to provide a 20% match for the cost of the project, which it likely will request from the El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organization. Socorro’s project would compete with other regional projects for funding.
Residents of the Bauman Road area who attended the public meeting expressed cautious optimism about the new plans, but remain on guard. They said the city government didn’t communicate with them as plans developed in 2020, but they said communications have improved.
“Finally, they started working on some of the alternatives, and they started showing some kind of progress to us. And now with this one, it seems like they’ve been working more on that third alternative that we didn’t see at the very beginning,” said Jose Flores, who could have seen much of his land and part of his home on Vineyard Road taken under the original plan.
“I feel it’s somewhat safe. I hope it’s safe enough,” he said after attending Wednesday’s meeting. “They haven’t decided, actually, on the alternative yet, so we still have to see the outcome. I’m still a little bit on the fence.”
Alma Hemme and her two daughters live on Bauman Road and attended the meeting. Hemme said she’s nearing 80 and has lived in her house for more than 40 years.
“We’re going to continue to fight on and see what’s going to happen in reality. We’ll see what happens. But I’m very happy that it’s changed, and I’m going to continue to think that maybe it will happen. I have a very positive attitude,” Hemme said.
Silvestre-Tobias, one of the leaders of the opposition to the Bauman Road route, said their progress is a testimony to the power of organizing.
“I think individuals do not understand the power that the people own,” she said. “Yes, we elect officials, but in reality, we have a lot of power. And I’m hoping that by going through this process, a lot of individuals have learned of the importance of staying involved.”