NORTH ROYALTON, Ohio -- Residents here are voting this fall on Issue 57, which if approved would lengthen City Council terms from two years to four years.
Council voted 6-1 in June to place the issue on the Nov. 7 ballot. If approved by voters, the new four-year terms will take effect in January 2026, after the November 2025 election.
All seven council members are up for re-election this year, although five are running unopposed. In most cases, if they’re re-elected this November, they would serve another two-year term.
Then, if the current council members are still on council in 2025 and again seek re-election, they would run for a four-year term for the first time.
Paul Marnecheck, who as council president is serving a four-year term, was the only council member who opposed the measure.
“I’m not opposed to four-year terms, but why do we need to change the current system?” Marnecheck told cleveland.com in July. “For 10 years, I ran for council every two years, and it was not much of an inconvenience. It keeps you close to the residents.”
Marnecheck said the city’s Charter Review Commission, a group of citizens appointed and assembled every four years, should decide whether to place a council-term amendment before voters. It’s the city charter that calls for two-year council terms.
Also, if a council member leaves office early in his or her term, and council appoints a replacement, the replacement might serve for three years or more without a vote of the people if council terms last four years, Marnecheck said.
“What’s the burden on residents?” Marnecheck said of the current two-year terms. “I haven’t had a sizable number of residents mention this to me as a problem. If it was a big deal, it would have come out of the Charter Review Commission.”
Councilman Michael Wos disagreed. He said residents have questioned him about the two-year council terms.
“When I campaign every other year, many community members express surprise and skepticism, questioning the rationale behind the present short-term council terms,” Wos told cleveland.com in a July email.
“It is our responsibility to listen to the concerns of those we represent and consider their desire for stability in governance,” Wos said.
Wos said term limits of 12 years would remain in place with four-year terms. Instead of six two-year terms, council members would serve a maximum of three four-year terms “while reducing the disruptions caused by continuous election campaign cycles.”
However, under the proposed charter amendment creating four-year council terms, council service prior to January 2026 would not be counted toward term limits.
“It (the change to four-year terms) allows elected officials to develop a deeper understanding of complex issues, learn from their experiences and effect lasting positive change,” Wos said.
“By granting council members a four-year term, we empower them to formulate comprehensive strategies and implement meaningful policies that will have a lasting impact on our community,” Wos said.
Wos said it’s only fair, considering that the mayor and council president serve four-year terms, that the rest of council have that same opportunity.