CHARLESTON, S.C. (WCSC) - The signing of a law abolishing constituent boards within the Charleston County School District leaves soon-discharged board members reeling and staff looking to formalize a path forward.
House Bill 4014 will ban the existence of constituent districts and boards, which oversee several duties: student discipline cases, student transfers and school zoning. Gov. Henry McMaster signed the law Monday evening, according to the Office of the Governor, placing those responsibilities into the hands of the district’s Board of Trustees.
District Superintendent Anita Huggins applauded the move on Tuesday. Huggins said the district is working with community members and principals through hearing panels to gauge a plan.
Huggins said the district is expected to share a formalized plan at a Committee of the Whole meeting on May 12.
“Our role is not to exclude them [families] whatsoever or to be prohibitive of the inclusion of them. Many districts, in fact, most districts across South Carolina, conduct hearings solely during the school day. That is not necessarily our intent at all,” Huggins said. “The process will be more efficient. It will be able to address concerns more rapidly.”
Huggins said the district will not propose a plan where hearings are conducted by one person, despite several school districts in the state and nation having this process.
Chief Financial Officer Daniel Prentice expects the move to save the district money and plans to adjust the upcoming 2026 budget discussion as needed.
“We had a plan in place to be able to add additional officers to have for 2026, but the net cost of the constituents in their current form would account for $300,000 in savings,” Prentice said.
The decision comes two months after exclusive documents obtained by Live5News revealed affidavits and emails pointing to unrest and questioning the power of constituent members. Some of the accusations involved Constituent District Four in North Charleston, which also saw a larger number of case overturns compared to other districts.
More than 50 principals asked the Charleston Legislative Delegation to consider disbanding the boards within the next week. Following public hearings, one hosting a large group of those advocating for the change, and another with many opposing it, the delegation took its findings back to the state house.
Constituent boards were created in 1968 around the eight former school districts in place at the time. Like the Board of Trustees, these are elected positions. Many constituent board members consider themselves to be volunteers, but do say they make around $20 per meeting.
District staff, state lawmakers and the governor claim this was the only remaining district in the nation with constituent board practices in place. Some constituent board members have denied this.
Nearly 60 constituent board members sit with a moment of uncertainty as the district works out how it will move forward.
“There was a time when the constituent boards had more involvement. And if it came back, would that be better? I simply do not know the answer to that,” Former District 10 constituent board member Francis Beylotte said. “I do think it is important that the district continues to keep community voices at the table.”
Beylotte said he resigned from his position after feeling he was witnessing potential bias and unfair treatment. He believes the ban will create better transparency across all 88 schools.
“My experience as a constituent board member made me realize beyond the shadow of a doubt that this kind of thing needs to be done by professionals, not politicians, volunteers, or people with nothing else to do. It made that 100% clear that it needs to happen now,” Beylotte said.
A constituent board member for District Three casts a shadow of doubt.
In a public comment on Monday, Katy Calloway said the Board of Trustees would be responsible for handling hundreds of student disciplinary cases, along with the other duties they cover. In the 2024-2025 school year, Calloway cited more than 700 across the district.
Calloway questioned whether the district would do this during “business hours,” as opposed to the constituent set-up of special meetings, typically done after school.
“We live in the neighborhoods we serve. A lot of the families we see for discipline issues are people we know. We see them in the grocery store, in church, on the weekends,” Calloway said. “Every student is different, and the constituent boards had the ability to really listen to students’ and parents’ concerns. That practice is going to be tabled to become efficient.”
Calloway was preparing to go into district meetings discussing the appointment of a middle school principal when she heard the law was being signed. She said the district is asking board members to “maintain their duties until the end of the year.”
Calloway also claimed board members were not included in current or prior discussions related to the board’s disbanding, although she figured for several years the idea was being suggested.
“Nobody asked us about our positions, or why we think we are objective, or needed, for that matter. So it was a little bit frustrating,” Calloway said. “My concern is they are really just kind of building the plane as it’s going down the runway.”
Governor McMaster released a full statement addressed to Representative Joe Bustos on H. 4014:
“I have signed into law R-23, H. 4014, which abolishes the constituent districts of the Charleston County School District and their respective boards of trustees. As the General Assembly is well aware, like several of my predecessors, I have consistently vetoed local or special legislation that violates the South Carolina Constitution. Our Constitution expressly prohibits the General Assembly from enacting legislation “for a specific county” and “where a general law can be made applicable.” S.C. Const. art VIII, § 7; S.C. Const. art. III, § 34(IX). Although our courts have held that greater deference is warranted in the context of public education, “legislation regarding education is not exempt from the requirements of Article III, § 34(IX).” Charleston Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Harrell, 393 S.C. 552, 558, 713 S.E.2d 604, 607 (2011). Therefore, I carefully review and consider all such legislation presented to me and scrutinize the same in view of the governing law. Absent other issues or infirmities, I have signed local or special legislation that is not clearly unconstitutional, such as where a general law could not be made applicable or where “a special law would best meet the exigencies of a particular situation.” Id. at 559, 713 S.E.2d at 608. Regardless, I have repeatedly cautioned the General Assembly to avoid relying on local legislation and, whenever possible, to instead address the underlying issues by passing laws of uniform, statewide application. Here, although H. 4014 plainly pertains to only Charleston County, apparently the Charleston County School District is the only district that still uses constituent districts. H. 4014 will, in other words, have the same effect as any statewide bill. In addition, the General Assembly has demonstrated that it is necessary to “best meet the exigencies of [this] particular situation.” Id. For instance, abolishing the constituent districts will lead to more consistent disciplinary action and result in significant financial savings. Therefore, I am persuaded that H. 4014 does not constitute impermissible local legislation based on the standards established by the South Carolina Supreme Court. The Honorable Joseph M. Bustos Page 2 April 28, 2025 For the foregoing reasons, I have signed H. 4014 into law.”
Copyright 2025 WCSC. All rights reserved.