Springdale residents who grappled with smokestack demolition in June argue the implosion would cause air quality issues
The scheduled implosion at the Cheswick Generating Station in Springdale on Friday has been postponed as a lawsuit and court battle play out three months after the demolition of the plant’s smokestacks caused damage and affected nearby residents.
The company charged with imploding the boiler house at the former plant must hold off on placing explosives until an Allegheny County judge can hear all arguments from residents seeking to halt the demolition.
In an injunction granted Monday, Common Pleas Judge John McVay Jr. ordered the “status quo” be maintained until after a hearing that began Wednesday afternoon concludes — that is, no explosives can be placed at the site until the judge can make a final ruling. The hearing will continue on Thursday, including testimony expected from residents who were impacted by a prior implosion of two smokestacks in early June.
The county announced Wednesday evening that the implosion was postponed.
At the hearing, attorneys for Controlled Demolition, Inc., Grant Mackay and Charah Solutions, the companies who completed a prior demolition of the two towering smoke stacks at Cheswick, moved to dissolve the injunction. If the motion wasn’t granted, they asked for a bond that was more than $750,000. That was the cost that one of the managers at the site, who testified Wednesday, said it would cost the companies if the implosion of the boiler house, which was originally scheduled to happen Friday at 8 a.m., was delayed.
The cost was attributed to demobilization and remobilization of equipment, and having to transport vehicles like water trucks, and remote radios for communications between workers, according to the site manager. Judge McVay Jr. denied the motion, and kept the bond at $50,000, which was previously required for the injunction he issued Monday.
The lawsuit — filed Friday on behalf of 10 families living on Pittsburgh and Washington streets, Standard Avenue and Duquesne Court — alleges the implosion of the boiler house would “unreasonably interfere with” their right to clean air, to use and enjoy their property, and to enjoy the “natural, scenic and esthetic value of the environment.”
The concerns stem from the last implosion at the site in June. Two towering smoke stacks were brought down, sending out a blast of air and reverberations that shook the neighborhood, shattered windows, and left everything coated in a thick layer of dust and debris.
Indeed, the lawsuit includes photos of blown out windows and window frames, cracks in plaster and drywall, and bowed siding.
Multiple residents said they’ve been unable to return to their homes since the first implosion because of the damage and the continued presence of toxins. Windows in homes were blown out, and there is structural damage to multiple properties, the plaintiffs allege. Two of them, Stacey and Thomas Ansell, stated that there are cracks in their basement that have increased in size since the implosion — one from 18 inches to eight feet long.
Others said in the lawsuit they began to experience health problems in the aftermath. One woman sought treatment for wheezing, coughing, congestion and other respiratory issues, and she’s continued receiving treatment ever since. Another man sought treatment for cornea damaged caused by the dust and debris, according to the lawsuit.
Based on the last implosion, the lawsuit contends, it is clear the residents will suffer more harm from another implosion if it is allowed to go on as scheduled.
During Wednesday’s hearing, attorneys for Controlled Demolition, Charah, and Grant Mackay said there’s “insufficient legal basis” for the preliminary injunction to stand. But John Kane, a attorney for the plaintiffs, questioned how the companies estimated how much it would cost to reschedule, if the injunction stood. A site manager, who declined to be interviewed after Wednesday’s hearing, testified multiple times that he knew it would be costly based on his experience, but added that he was supplied the exact numbers by Controlled Demolition and Grant Mackay.
Mr. Kane said after the hearing that he expected the defendants to attempt to dissolve the preliminary injunction again on Thursday.
Following the June implosion, the state’s Department of Environmental Protection completed a PA Blasting and Explosive Investigation Standard Report, where it concluded that Controlled Demolition, Inc. was responsible for extensive property damage, and damage to nearby utility lines, according to the lawsuit. They determined that nine residential or commercial properties had been damaged, issuing nine citations for those.
Six citations were issued for exceeding airblast limited listed in the approved permit for the implosion, one was issued for failing to prevent flyrock, and another was written to causing damage to utility lines, the suit stated.
The first implosion followed months of decommissioning work at the site which began shortly after Cheswick — Allegheny County’s last coal-fired powerplant — stopped making power in the spring of 2022. Kentucky-based environmental remediation firm Charah Solutions Inc. took over the site from GenOn and has been removing equipment and scrap.
Charah hired Grant Mackay as the main contractor, and Controlled Demolition, Inc. as a subcontractor, officials said. Scott Reschly, vice president of operations at Charah, said that Trifecta Services was another subcontractor on-site to assist, but that that company did not have “specific oversight” of the actual implosion.
First Published September 20, 2023, 9:39am