The Fair Share Housing Center contended that the Township's obligation was 565 units,? while the Township pushed for 223 units.
HILLSBOROUGH, NJ — The Township was successfully able to lower its required New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA) fourth-round affordable housing obligation from 565 units to 223 units.
On Tuesday night, the Township Committee approved a resolution accepting its Housing Plan Element and Fair Share Plan to meeting its obligation. The plan was previously approved by the Township Planning Board at its June 12 meeting.
"The fact that the number that was given to us of 565 was laughable in my opinion but with the work of our group we significantly were able to show proof and the math to reduce it to the number we think it should be, which was 223," said said Committeeman Shawn Lipani on Tuesday. "But remember 223 affordable units means roughly a thousand total units. So imagine if we had to do 565 units what that number would be, over 2,000."
"This is the struggle we’ve had. It's a tough decision but we had to make it... We didn't really have the choice," said Mayor John Ciccarelli. "We looked at the applications and made the decision on developments that we think can best solve this for our township and we will see what happens in the next 10 years when the fifth round happens."
A total of 14 projects are proposed to make up the 223 units including four group homes on Amwell Road and Zion Road, townhomes, three duplex affordable units by Habitat for Humanity, apartments, and more.
>
Committeewoman Samantha Hand criticized the Township's handling of the affordable housing process and read comments made by Judge William G. Mennen in the process.
"Compounding the complications caused by Hillsborough’s scant report was the fact that Hillsborough did not timely provide the missing requested information in advance of the program’s sponsored settlement," read Hand of Mennen's comments. "Hillsborough undermined the mediation process by repeatedly failing to provide important information to the court, to the program and to the challengers."
"This again shows we were late to class. Didn’t do all the homework and had no excuse for it. I think its embarrassing for the town. I think it was mishandled," said Hand.
Township Fair Share Housing Attorney David Bernstein said the Township did provid "to fair share housing all of the documents that were necessary to support our initial request for a reduction... It was not provided immediately because my office did not recall receiving the request from fair share. When it was asked for a second time at the hearing… it was provided within an hour after."
Bernstein called Mennen's comments "more political than it is realtisic."
Hand also called for a Motion to hire a new fair share housing counsel. However, it did not receive a second from the Committee.
See Judge Mennen's full comments below:
Judge Mennen's Opinion (6.5.25) by Alexis Tarrazi on Scribd
>
"We were told things were being filed on time. We had complete information and then to read this document it felt like being scolded in the principal’s office. I think its embarrassing for the entire town," said Hand.
Ciccarelli said he was not surprised about what was written by Mennen.
"I fully expected it. [New Jersey Department of Community Affairs] was never going to admit that they were not right, not applicable. The state cabal did what it does. Backed one another up, weren’t going to change the number," said Ciccarelli.
"It wasn’t about the numbers. It is about protecting our town and not putting the township at risk. These are real laws with consequences. It sounds like we were playing fast and loose. Hopefully this works out," said Hand.
Lipani noted that the Township was well within the bounds of laws in terms of meeting deadlines for its affordable housing obligation.
"There was no fast and loose ever. For someone who wasn’t in the room or in the meetings and reading from the outside I really don’t think you have an informed information to back up what you are saying," said Lipani. "We are fully in compliance and this will be submitted in 48 hours of this vote which is before the June 30 deadline."
The Committee ultimately voted to approve the affordable housing plan with Committeeman Robert Britting, Jr. saying, "I am happy we were able to get the number down."
Hand voted in favor of the affordable housing plan but "with reservations."
Lipani also voted in favor of the plan with "no reservations at all, 100 percent yes."
Bernstein noted that after this plan is filed with the state the public will have 60 days to comment or object to the plan.
"This is another stop on this so called train on this matter that will go on for the rest of the year," said Bernstein.