Residents and Committee Members disagreed on the possible benefits of introducing an ordinance to create a film studio in the Township.
Alexis Tarrazi, Patch Staff
|Updated Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:18 am ET
BASKING RIDGE, NJ — The possibility of a movie studio coming to Basking Ridge raised "excitement" and disagreements among Township Committee members and the public during a contentious meeting last week.
The ordinance proposing to create a film studio and community campus overlay zone within the R-1 Zone would be located at the current Verizon campus off N Maple Avenue near Interstate 287.
Mayor Jennifer Asay said this proposal includes a film studio with four sound stages with all activity to take place inside. It also includes a community center and housing for 16 adults with special needs and a workforce development and education space for those adults with special needs to use to get education and training for employment.
The ordinance was placed on the agenda the night before the Dec. 10 meeting raising concerns about transparency.
"I've been sitting up here on the dais for five years and we've been telling our residents that there would be transparency and any ordinance that comes before us we would evaluate to the fullest extent. We haven’t been transparent with you. This ordinance was presented to the public 24 hours ago. At 7 p.m. Monday night, which we usually post on Friday," said Deputy Mayor Janice Fields. "This has never happened before in the five years I’ve been sitting here on the Township Committee. As public stewards of this community, residents deserve better from us. We have not been transparent with the scope of this project that is before us tonight."
Find out what's happening in Basking Ridgefor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Fields along with Committeeman Andrew McNally asked for the ordinance to be removed from the agenda to give more time for review.
"This is a major development, unlike anything that Bernards has ever approved before. I personally have not had enough time to consider the proposal of this magnitude which stands to change the fabric of Bernards," said McNally.
A vote to remove the ordinance from the agenda on Dec. 10 was turned down.
"This is an introduction and all we are trying to do is make it transparent to you that this is a potential. We would like to take it to you at the next meeting then we can hear from the public at large. Those that live most closely and most likely affected and also the residents in the community at large," said Asay.
Around 10 residents spoke at the meeting, with many echoing Fields and McNally's concerns for more time to review this ordinance.
"I would urge you to really consider this because this is last-minute railroading and we are getting railroaded in terms of the people in the neighborhood," said Jaime McQuade who lives near the proposed film studio site.
Township Attorney John Belardo explained the ordinance process where an introduction needed to be approved by the Township Committee before it goes before the Planning Board for review at their Dec. 17 meeting. If approved, the ordinance would then come back to the Township Committee for a public hearing and final vote on Dec. 23.
If the Township Committee finalizes the ordinance, the developer would then need to submit a site plan application and go through the whole Planning Board process and hearings before a vote would be rendered.
Resident Tim Ingling said he still felt "the timing is a lot of rush. We don’t even have a brief demonstration or brief facsimile of what it will look like if that will help to really show the true impact."
Resident Harry Wyman shared concerns about traffic and congestion in the area and also his frustration on the timing of the public hearing so close to the holidays.
"We don’t need any movie studios in town, especially in that area. This is just ridiculous. And the fact you are going to take a vote on the 23rd. So I have to come back here on the day before Christmas Eve, that’s ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous," said Wyman.
Asay noted that the need to act on this opportunity now had to do with a timeline for the developer to acquire a competitive film tax credit from the New Jersey Economic Development Authority.
"There are three slots and two remaining with multiple people bidding," said Asay.
"Why is the developer’s time table more important than the future of our community?" questioned Fields.
McNally added that he was not convinced the Township Committee doesn't act now that the prospect of a movie studio goes away.
"Let's take our time. Let's review this thing in a more fulsome manner. Let’s gather some feedback," said McNally. "The developer’s timeline even if not in a position to get the credits that's not my concern, my concern is the residents of this town."
Not everyone was against the proposal of a film studio coming to the Township.
Resident Karen Fischer thanked the Committee for their "creativity for bringing this to our town."
"When I did hear about this, my initial reaction is excitement," said Fischer whose son is part of the Ridge Drama Club. "There was a lot of excitement for the potential opportunities and what that could mean for the Ridge students… amazing opportunities."
Resident Sherry Nelson said she was "intrigued" about the proposal.
"I am interested to see what type of positive this would be for our community to have housing for adults and students with disabilities. I am open to hearing more," said Nelson.
Committeeman Gary Baumann noted that "the introduction of the ordinance is not a decision to build a movie studio. It’s an introduction of an ordinance that leads to public hearings. Many of us up on the dais have the same questions, we need to know… before we get there need to see that as a proposal."
Committeewoman Ana Duarte McCarthy discussed the benefits such as revenue that film has brought to New Jersey, new and consistent tax ratables, revenue opportunities for ancillary businesses — such as hotels, restaurants, dry cleaning — providing a location for local students to experience skills-based learning, and opportunities to provide housing for adults with disabilities ad special needs.
"In light of the growth of the film industry in the state and the unique positioning of Bernards Township, it is something that we want to look at to consider the opportunity for growth and development in this community and I’m supportive of the ordinance in concept," said Duarte McCarthy.
"The way that some people act when they are faced with an opportunity they either dig in and try to figure it out or they throw their hands up and say I need more time," said Asay. "It should be in the best interest of our community to think about options. Considering options this is not jamming a film studio in our community."
While not unanimous, the Township Committee ultimately voted to introduce the ordinance to create a film studio and community campus. Asay, Baumann, and Duarte McCarthy voted in favor of the ordinance while Fields and McNally voted against it.
The ordinance goes before the Planning Board for review on Tuesday, Dec. 17 before coming back to the Township Committee on Dec. 23 for a public hearing.
Have a news tip? Email [email protected].
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.