Elon Law students met with judges on the North Carolina Court of Appeals and watched the court in session. The court heard oral arguments in two cases: one involving statutes around claims of professional malpractice, and another involving an injury sustained during a high school lacrosse game.
Elon Law students heard from some of the state’s highest-ranking jurists when the North Carolina Court of Appeals held proceedings in the school’s courtroom and took their questions.
Judges John Tyson, April Wood and Christopher Freeman heard arguments on April 3, 2025, in Puma Biotechnology Inc. v. Hendrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo LLP, which involves questions around statutes of limitations that govern when cases can be refiled. Attorneys for Puma Biotechnology argue the trial court erred in determining their case wasn’t re-filed within those prescribed time frames.
Attorneys in Fenderson v. Davidson Day School also presented arguments in a negligence case arising from a high school lacrosse game where a player was paralyzed during a play. The plaintiff-appellant’s counsel argues that the athlete’s family’s claims of negligence were improperly dismissed by a trial court, which also granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Arguments took place in the Robert E. Long Courtroom inside Elon University’s downtown Greensboro law school. The N.C. Court of Appeals visits the law school annually to hear cases before students and faculty.
“We learn about, craft and practice oral arguments in class, but seeing experienced attorneys present their cases is completely different. It sets the bar in terms of what we should be aiming for,” said Saniya Pangare L’25, a graduate of North Carolina State University and a Leadership Fellow at the School of Law. Pangare is interested in complex litigation and completed her residency with U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jimmie V. Reyna in the District of Columbia Circuit.
“I think the Residency program sets this school apart. I have found that putting students in a legal practice for an extended period of time daily to be invaluable. That’s been a boon for me and my chambers, and I think it shows why so many clerks have been hired from Elon: You’ve gotten that training and you’re ready.” – Judge John Tyson, N.C. Court of Appeals
Landon Eckard L’25, who plans a career in appellate advocacy and constitutional litigation, focused on how lawyers responded to questions and the contrast in style among each judges’ questions and attorneys’ arguments.
“The most valuable thing for me was observing the spontaneity between the judges and advocates: how an advocate’s response prompted the judge to inquire further on a particular point or to shift to a different issue the case presented,” said Eckard, who graduated from Appalachian State University and completed his residency this winter with U.S. District Court Judge Susan C. Rodriguez in the Western District of North Carolina. “It shows that the true purpose of oral arguments is to engage in conversation with judges and address their concerns.”
New alumni return as court clerks
The hearings marked a homecoming for several recent Elon graduates now clerking for judges at the N.C. Court of Appeals.
Addie Ackley L’24 began working as a judicial law clerk in Tyson’s office last month after completing her Residency-in-Practice and an additional internship with his office. Libby Fadl L’24 and Ashton Hopson L’24 both began clerking for Freeman this winter. For Fadl and Hopson, the oral arguments at Elon Law were the first they’d attended as clerks in their new positions.
During a Q&A session after the hearings, Tyson praised Elon Law’s experiential curriculum and cited it as a primary reason Elon Law graduates are frequently hired as clerks by judges on the Court of Appeals.
“I think the Residency program sets this school apart,” Tyson said. “I have found that putting students in a legal practice for an extended period of time daily to be invaluable. That’s been a boon for me and my chambers, and I think it shows why so many clerks have been hired from Elon: You’ve gotten that training and you’re ready. It makes a difference when you can demonstrate that level of skill.”
Both Fadl and Hopson listened to counsels’ arguments with new perspectives, focused less on how the attorneys made their arguments — which absorbed most of their attention during their law school days — and more on the content and persuasiveness they employed.
“Returning to Elon Law for our first oral arguments, I felt such a deep sense of gratitude to share a small part of my early career with the community that helped me create it,” Hopson said. “The most important duty we owe to our clients is competency, and when speaking with someone in the legal field, they tell you they ‘practice’ law. I believe our profession always calls for us to be students, which is pretty amazing.”
The student Q&A was moderated by Caroleen Dineen, associate professor of law and director of the Legal Method and Communication Program. Judges and attorneys representing the cases responded to students’ questions about how cases are decided and how lawyers craft persuasive legal briefs. Before the hearings, students and faculty interacted with judges and court staff over lunch.
“We are so excited each year to have the Court of Appeals visit and provide our students the opportunity to learn about advocacy through observing distinguished judges and advocates in action,” said Alan Woodlief, vice dean and professor of law. “Opportunities like these spark student interest in advocacy generally and specifically in pursuing prestigious judicial clerkships upon graduation and Residencies-in-Practice while students. It was a proud moment when the judges recognized several Elon Law alumni and students in attendance who are currently working with the court.”
Posted in: Careers & Outcomes Events Student Experience
Tagged: Academics Admissions Career Services (Law) Graduate Admissions School of Law