Even with all the construction projects going on across the city, Golden might be a little quieter in the evenings and on Sundays and holidays.
Officials are planning to change the city code regarding construction noise, lighting, fencing, parking and similar items. Nothing has been finalized yet, but proposed changes include shortening the time construction noise is allowed and requiring construction lighting to be shielded so it’s not shining on neighboring properties.
Noise and lighting language changes would go into effect immediately and impact any ongoing projects, staff confirmed.
Other changes, like those around parking, would be based on when a project submitted its applications and permits. Ongoing projects that had already received their permits likely wouldn’t be impacted, but any future projects would be.
Staff members discussed the proposed changes with City Councilors at a June 17 work session, and Public Works Director Anne Beierle said the next step is to get input from construction companies that frequently work in Golden.
Beierle and her colleagues are planning to bring the official ordinance language to the City Council for approval later this year, possibly August and/or September. Approval would require two readings, with a public hearing at the second reading.
Beierle said Golden staff members researched other Colorado municipalities to see what their restrictions were for construction noise, lighting, etc., and referenced those when drafting the proposed changes.
For construction noise, Golden currently allows it between 7 a.m.-9 p.m. daily.
However, city staff is recommending changing it to 7 a.m.-7 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. Construction noise would not be allowed on Sundays or federal holidays.
Code Enforcement Supervisor Jamie Segal clarified that this would apply to single-day projects and maintenance projects.
Segal described how he frequently receives complaints about construction noise, mostly regarding crews starting loud work too early in the morning.
Mayor Laura Weinberg said she also gets frequent complaints about construction noise, but wondered about reducing the days construction noise is allowed.
“That means the projects are going to go longer, and that’s a concern of mine,” Weinber said.
Beierle and Segal pointed out how certain types of work, especially indoor work, aren’t subject to the time-related restrictions. So long as the work isn’t loud enough that it can be heard on other properties, crews can work at any time on any day, they said.
Councilor Don Cameron was concerned that 7 a.m.-7 p.m. noise restrictions would force crews to work in the heat of the day, and he wanted to avoid that for health and safety reasons.
Beierle clarified that residents or companies can already get special permits to allow for construction noise outside of the allowed timeframe. It must fall under certain criteria and be approved by the city manager.
Those doing so are already required to notify anyone within a one-block radius of after-hours construction noise, she said.
Cameron and Councilor Paul Haseman asked that, when possible, the permittees also post signs about the after-hours noise and how it’s been approved by the city.
Regarding lighting, Beierle and Segal said they wanted to clarify existing city code to ensure that any temporary or construction lighting fixtures are shielded. This means all the light will be pointed downward and won’t be leaving the respective property.
For fencing, Beierle said the current city code language is “pretty vague on what a fence is.” Thus, the city wants to provide clarity, saying a construction fence must be “a sturdy barricade” at least five feet high. These would be required for construction excavations.
A lack of any or proper fencing is the most common complaint Golden’s Code Enforcement department receives, she described.
Weinberg and other councilors wanted to ensure that these fences must be able to withstand strong winds, describing how current ones sometimes blow over.
Councilor Rob Reed also pointed out how requiring fencing for the entire length of a project could help with security concerns, saying it would keep people out of job sites and protect tools and equipment left overnight. If people steal workers’ tools, he said, it’ll only increase construction costs.
For construction parking, Beierle said city staff wants general contractors to submit a parking plan for a project that lasts more than 30 calendar days.
If parking is provided outside the right-of-way, no permit would be required. However, if crews were to park in the right of way, they would need a special permit to do so to ensure “the least interference with rights and convenience of property owners and residents,” she said.
Beierle added that this topic “has been the hardest one to come up with the solution” among city staff, but she envisioned this as a “starting point.”
She added: “We can implement this and then revisit it in six months.”
For right-of-way use, Beierle recommended that Golden require that “no parking” signs related to construction parking in the right of way must be placed at least 24 hours in advance and include the dates when parking is prohibited.
The councilors were overall supportive of these proposed changes, with Councilor Patty Evans saying, “I think this would benefit everyone — that there’s a (parking) plan.”
We encourage comments. Your thoughts, ideas and concerns play a critical role helping Colorado Community Media be more responsive to your needs. We expect conversations to follow the conventions of polite discourse. Therefore, we won't allow posts that: