John Adams Academy’s application to the Colorado Charter School Institute, submitted in March, provides the clearest look to date at what the charter school proposes for Sterling Ranch, including its vision for a classical K-12 program, a projected enrollment of 825 students and a multimillion-dollar budget.
The academy plans to open in August 2026, starting with grades K-7, and aims to expand by one grade each year until it reaches a full K-12 model.
The 644-page application outlines a curriculum built on patriotic rituals, mentorship and liberal arts instruction rooted in America’s founding ideals. While supporters call it a welcome addition to the growing community, critics argue that the school’s approach is ideologically driven, duplicative of some existing education models in Douglas County and designed to avoid local oversight.
“This is a blatant attempt to sidestep the district and impose a rigid, politically-charged model that doesn’t reflect the values of most families here,” one Sterling Ranch parent wrote in a letter to the Douglas County District Accountability Committee. “We just passed a bond to build a neighborhood school. We don’t need this.”
The decision to seek state-level authorization has fueled the controversy surrounding the charter school’s proposal.
Last December, the Douglas County school board narrowly voted to release the charter’s application to the Colorado Charter School Institute, shifting control away from the district and cutting off future oversight.
“Once you four vote to do this, they will be gone forever and they will never be required to communicate with us again,” board member Brad Geiger said during that December meeting.
The board members who voted in favor of the request said they favored charter autonomy and believed it would protect the school from leadership changes that may oppose policy waivers the charter would seek.
Colorado Community Media reached out to Ellie Reynolds, founder of John Adams Academy in Douglas County, for comment. This article will be updated if she responds.
According to the application, John Adams Academy would implement what it calls an “American Classical Leadership Education” model. The curriculum emphasizes the study of classic literature, primary source documents and Socratic discussion. It also includes oral exams, patriotic songs and daily flag ceremonies as part of a school culture focused on civic virtue and character development.
The school’s stated goal is to cultivate “servant leaders” prepared to defend liberty and participate in self-government. Lessons would center around four pillars: Core Values, the Classics, the Liberal Arts and the Art of Mentoring.
The application frames its approach as a departure from “modern education models that simply focus on standardized testing and workforce preparation,” and instead prioritizes developing students who can “think deeply, lead ethically and defend freedom.”
Despite its distinctive ideological framework, the school’s academic plan commits to meeting or exceeding Colorado’s graduation standards. The application outlines plans to align coursework with state benchmarks, implement Individual Career and Academic Plans and offer required credit hours across core content areas.
John Adams Academy currently operates three campuses in northern California, serving more than 4,000 students. The application describes those schools as high-performing, with an equal number of students on waitlists.
But critics in Douglas County have pointed to publicly available data suggesting those campuses underperform compared to state averages.
“These old-fashioned methods stifle creativity and critical thinking and exacerbate existing learning deficits,” wrote another Sterling Ranch resident in a letter to the District Accountability Committee.
Others have questioned whether the model is designed to serve a broad public audience or a narrower ideological niche.
“The way they describe the curriculum makes it clear they’re pushing a very particular worldview,” said a parent who spoke at a recent district meeting. “It doesn’t sound like education for everyone — it sounds like education for people who already agree with them.”
In its application, John Adams Academy projects steady growth from 410 students in its first year to 825 by year five. As of March 24, the school reported collecting 291 letters of intent and said it expects to reach 350 before the Colorado Charter School Institute makes a final decision in June.
But that figure still falls short of the 410 students needed to meet the school’s first-year enrollment goal, and, potentially, its budget assumptions. The proposed budget relies heavily on per-pupil funding, meaning under-enrollment in the first year could trigger financial shortfalls or require significant adjustments.
Even among the intent-to-enroll numbers, there are signs of a mismatch. Three dozen families expressed interest in enrolling eighth graders, but the school does not plan to offer eighth grade until the second year. That gap raises additional questions about how many letters of intent reflect students who would actually be eligible to attend when the school opens.
The application frames early interest as evidence of unmet demand in the Sterling Ranch area, where population growth continues.
However, critics argue that demand doesn’t justify launching a new charter school, especially when the district already plans to open a neighborhood school in the same area in 2027.
Several opponents also noted in letters to the district that the district is closing or consolidating neighborhood schools in nearby Highlands Ranch due to declining enrollment, raising questions about whether capacity is truly a concern.
Still, some families argued that the interest in John Adams Academy reflects a legitimate desire for educational alternatives.
“My neighbors and I have had to send our kids outside the area just to access charter schools,” one Sterling Ranch resident wrote in a letter supporting the application. “There are more than enough students here for two schools.”
In year one, John Adams Academy anticipates bringing in just under $4.6 million to support 410 students and 16 full-time teachers. By year five, that number climbs to more than $9.8 million with 825 students and 31 teachers.
The application includes no tuition revenue and minimal outside fundraising, meaning nearly all income depends on meeting enrollment projections and receiving full state funding. If the school fails to enroll enough students, it could face a significant gap between expected revenue and actual funding.
On the expense side, the school proposes average teacher salaries starting at $52,000, with administrative staffing ramping up alongside enrollment.
The budget also accounts for payments to the American Classical Lyceum, a contracted public benefit corporation tied to John Adams Academy in California.
The application does not detail the cost breakdown of that relationship or how much will be spent on management fees, curriculum licensing or other services.
The Colorado Charter School Institute requires new schools to present a realistic and sustainable financial plan. According to its guidance, budgets should reflect conservative enrollment estimates and include contingency planning – areas where critics say the John Adams Academy proposal falls short.
“They’re relying almost entirely on optimistic enrollment numbers and state funding,” one opponent wrote in a letter to the District Accountability Committee. “There’s very little room for error. If the numbers don’t materialize, the school and its students will feel it immediately.”
The Colorado Charter School Institute has 90 days from the submission date, March 24, to evaluate the application and issue a decision. That process includes a public meeting, a staff review and a final vote by the board.
Tagged: Colorado Charter School InstituteDouglas County school choiceJohn Adams Academynew charter school in Sterling RanchSterling Ranch charter schoolUPDATE ME
Leave a comment
We encourage comments. Your thoughts, ideas and concerns play a critical role helping Colorado Community Media be more responsive to your needs. We expect conversations to follow the conventions of polite discourse. Therefore, we won't allow posts that:
You must be logged in to post a comment.