PICKENS — The former Pickens city administrator fired two months ago without a severance deal is answering publicly the city’s basis for his termination — which alleges inappropriate comments, touching female employees without consent, poor relations with the city’s finance department and falsely accusing a sitting City Council member.
The former administrator, Tim O’Briant, said the city’s reasons listed in a termination letter were “created out of whole cloth” to avoid paying him more than a year’s severance and are allegations that he never got to adequately confront.
“In most circles, that’s called extortion, pure and simple,” O’Briant told The Post and Courier on Oct. 9.
In a special-called meeting Aug. 27, Pickens City Council voted 4-3 to terminate O’Briant “with cause,” which frees the city of a legal obligation to compensate him.
The city didn’t immediately elaborate, citing privacy surrounding personnel issues.
This week, on Oct. 5, City Council after a lengthy closed-door session voted 4-3 to enter into settlement negotiations with O’Briant.
In the time since his firing, O’Briant has been publicly defiant. He said he wasn’t given a reason until he received a termination letter — obtained by The Post and Courier — after the vote.
The two sides are currently in settlement talks, and O’Briant said that if those aren’t “fruitful,” taking legal action would be the next step.
“It was a vindictive move because their case is so weak and they know they can’t win if it goes to court,” O’Briant told The Post and Courier. “There’s simply no basis to support it or any of the charges. A group of Council members want me gone and they needed cause to avoid paying out 16 months of my contract.”
“They needed it, so they created it out of whole cloth,” he said. “It’s a shame that these elected officials, currently in the majority, would stoop to this level of dishonesty in an attempt to avoid commitments the Council has made.”
The city of Pickens has declined to offer more details.
“Because this matter is the subject of pending litigation, the City will not be commenting at this time,” the city said in an Oct. 9 statement. “The City remains committed to serving the residents of Pickens, and city operations and services continue as normal.”
However, a City Council member who was indirectly referenced in the termination letter, Jonathan Baker, told The Post and Courier he believes the city stands on solid legal ground.
The council a week before the termination had put O’Briant on paid administrative leave, which Baker said gave the city’s legal team time to make sure the city followed proper procedure and didn’t violate any of O’Briant’s rights.
Baker said O’Briant was presented the allegations detailed in the termination letter during a closed-door session, during which Baker said O’Briant explained himself. Baker said O’Briant has been threatening legal action but he’s yet to see any sign of it.
“He did get an opportunity to come in front of council in executive session and address some concerns to make sure that we were not being misinformed,” Baker said. “We did have admissions for some of the scenarios that were presented against him, and he did make some claims, but in the end, he did have an opportunity for that.”
The termination letter lists four causes against O’Briant, who was hired in January 2024 after leaving an economic development role in the city of Aiken.
First, it claims that O’Briant “repeatedly made inappropriate comments and exhibited unprofessional behavior” that violates his professional duties and opens the city to “serious potential legal liabilities.”
The second claim is that O’Briant “touched female employees on multiple occasions without their consent,” which it said also exposes the city to legal liabilities.
The third suggests that O’Briant wasn’t able to “appropriately manage relationships and workflow with the city’s finance department,” which prevented him from properly administering the policies and affairs of the city.
The final claim involves an unnamed councilman whom O’Briant made false claims about in an email published to the Council and others.
In an open council session this past July, O’Briant publicly apologized to Baker for sending an email that claimed Baker was verbally abusive to city staff, after video evidence proved otherwise. In his 2025 campaign for his council seat, Baker as a private citizen was an outspoken critic of O’Briant’s handling of negotiations regarding the city’s water service.
In the email incident, Baker told The Post and Courier that O’Briant had instructed two employees to submit documents saying that Baker was abusive. Baker said the employees followed the instruction but “were not OK with that.”
In a nearly 2,000-word document O’Briant presented to the council ahead of its Oct. 5 vote on entering settlement negotiations, he gave context to each of the four claims detailed in the termination letter.
On the inappropriate comments cause, O’Briant said that he had made general comments about a potential hire in front of employees related to whether the person had had cosmetic surgery. O’Briant said he made reference to the potential hire’s “rear end,” comments that he said were later relayed by employees as being more vulgar.
O’Briant said the comment on cosmetic surgery was part of his “assessment of psychology, judgment, presentation, and potential cultural fit within the organization.”
The allegation of improper touching, O’Briant said, should be considered in the context that he’s accused of hugging an employee and kissing her on the forehead but that the two had done so over an extended period of time and that it was well-known that the interactions were welcomed and platonic up until the employee expressed it was not consensual. O’Briant said he was never allowed to provide that context as the council considered the terms of his firing.
On the financial front, O’Briant said that Council had shifted the management structure from the finance director reporting to Council to reporting to the administrator. Under that supervisory structure, O’Briant raised concerns about the department after a 2026 audit of 2024 finances showed deficiencies that he tried to address and had Council’s approval to do so.
The email involving Baker, he said, came at a time when O’Briant was sleeping at the hospital as his wife suffered what was believed could be a life-threatening illness and he received reports that he relied on from employees about Baker’s conduct. After reviewing the video evidence of the encounter, O’Briant said he concluded the accounts were hyperbole, and he corrected the record via email and publicly apologized.
Follow Eric on X at @cericconnor.