The City of Grass Valley is in a contract with Grindline Skateparks, Inc. to demolish the current 20,500 square foot skatepark in Condon Park and rebuild a new modern 15,000 square foot skatepark.
During a city council meeting this week, the members of the council decided to honor that contact and not change direction, even after hearing objections from people in the local skateboarding community.
If the city broke the contract with Grindline, and halted the demolition scheduled to begin on May 19, they may risk losing the Prop 64 grant money, part of which has already been spent.
Grindline has invoiced approximately $175,000 for the design and consulting work so far, according to Zac Quentmeyer, Deputy Public Works Director for Grass Valley.
Grindline has also placed an order for the steel package to be used for the rails and “coping” on the corners of the skate elements, according to Quentmeyer.
“If the city broke the contract, Grindline could come after the damages for the loss of profit, and the loss of work their employees were expecting,” according to Quentmeyer. “The amount the city may have to pay is upwards of $200,000 or more.”
Potentially, as much as $400,000 of the $1,500,000 from the State of California would then need to be repaid to the Prop 64 Health and Safety Grant; the remaining balance may also have to be returned.
Ad hoc committee formed for potential future expansion
The city council gave direction to create an ad hoc committee to consider additional options for a phase 2 expansion of the 15,000 square foot plan from Grindline.
In the future, a phase 3 skatepark at another location may be planned if funding becomes available; however, that would require environmental studies, public workshops, and other time-consuming requirements.
It was maintained that “blowing up” the contract between the city and Grindline is not fiscally responsible, according to Councilmember Tom Ivy.
In the past few weeks approximately 1,700 signatures against the demolition were collected, however the public comment period for the project was several months ago.
“I think some of the best things that have come out of the last two weeks is all the engagement that we’ve received,” Quentmeyer said. “While it’s true that we were hoping for some of this engagement to come earlier, staff doesn’t see this as a negative, but we’re looking at it as a huge positive. I would encourage the skate community to stay engaged.”
The chamber at city hall was filled with members of the skate community hoping to influence the council and stop the demolition of the current skatepark.
“Please don’t take the skatepark, there’s nothing wrong with it,” one public speaker said to the council.
Speakers pleaded with the city council to reverse their decision, and referred to the current skatepark as their “home” where they found support from one another.
When the city was asking for public input on the proposed project, a group called Nevada County Skate (NSC) and many others in the community worked with the city to provide feedback to Grindline on the project’s design.
Now that the demolition is set to begin, another group named the Grass Valley Skatepark Coalition (GVSC) informed the city that they think the current park is adequate, and the plan for the proposed park is too small — even saying the smaller park is a safety hazard.
Members from GVSC told the council that many people did not know about the process of public input, and that the people who did participate in the workshops with Grindline were not heard and included.
“NCS… they stole our voice… They meddled and they manipulated both parties. They did not represent us,” one speaker at Tuesday night’s meeting said. “NCS cheated us. They took our voice, and they lied.”
The division within the skateboarding community itself has been apparent in the past few weeks.
“They are a very small part of this community, and they didn’t represent us,” the speaker said. “It’s very saddening, heartbreaking. We’re all in a bad place now. You guys at the city are in a predicament. We’re devastated.”
The decision by the council to move forward and demolish the current skatepark in Condon Park to prepare the space for a rebuild was upheld.
The 20-year-old skatepark has cracks that reportedly pose a safety hazard to its users, and the foundation underneath it is in jeopardy, according to Matt Fluegge, Chief Executive Officer for Grindline Skatepark Inc.
“There are definitely some areas of the existing park of concern for both safety and longevity,” Fluegge said during a public workshop with members of the skate community back in April 2024.
The shifting of the slabs at the bottom of the bowl is a primary concern that would increase over time.
Rehabilitating the park and expanding it was an option originally discussed over a year ago, though the city council took the advice of Fluegge who recommended demolition and a complete rebuild.
The topography of the current skatepark creates an engineering problem as well.
“Water is probably flowing down that hillside under the park, trapped under there,” Fluegge said.
“This is an agenda information item,” the city’s attorney David Ruderman said. “We can take direction, but there can be no action on this item tonight.”
The council did already vote and approve the contract with Grindline, according to Ruderman.
If changes to the project were made, the state may not reissue the grant, according to Councilmember Jan Arbuckle.
“In the worst case scenario, you end up with no park,” Arbuckle said. “Or we go forward with something that not everybody likes.”
The council has voted to move forward with Grindline three times, according to Arbuckle.
“The mayor put it back on the agenda because you guys signed this petition,” Arbuckle said. “I don’t know how many times we’re going to have this meeting and hear the same thing over and over again, being told the same figures makes no sense to me. It’s a bad use of staff time.”
The council agreed to form an ad hoc committee which would include two members of the council, city staff, and members from both NCS and GVSC to seek funding for a phase 2 skatepark.
Options could include expanding the current location, or building another skatepark near it.
An extension built on to the current skate park at the existing site leaves more room to expand in the future, according to Kiser.
Working with the state to make changes to the current terms of the Prop 64 grant is a slow process, according to Kiser.
Kiser told the council and the public that he has submitted questions regarding the possibility of changing the terms of the proposed grant, and has not received a reply.
“You may be able to settle the contract with Grindline for $200,000 or whatever has been spent today; the worst case scenario is the $450,000. I can’t tell you,” Kiser said.
Kiser could not guarantee that the state would approve changes to the current grant or any future grant submission.
“My thought is to (create) the ad hoc committee, commit a small amount of money to have Grindline do a (draft) concept,” Kiser said. “The point is to have a drawing and a figure that you can go after funding for, because that’s what the grants want to see.”
In the world of grant funding and application approval, definite plans for any project and its costs need to be presented in order to qualify for grant funding, especially in a competitive environment when the state is in a fiscal deficit.
On Wednesday, Quentmeyer said that he reached out to Grindline and “floated the idea of the option for them to draft a proposal for a second phase, and Grindline replied that they would be more than happy to work with the city on that.”
“Initially we will be looking at an expansion at Condon,” Quentmeyer said. “All of the options for phase 2 are on the table.”
Next steps
Eric Gorman, a spokesperson for GVSC, said his organization did not believe that the Prop 64 grant money would be jeopardized if plans for the skatepark were changed.
“We weren’t able to accomplish our goal last night, but we are continuing to fight for what we believe the community deserves,” Gorman said.
Gorman is in the process of calling all of the city council members, urging them to request another meeting with the city manager.
Four out of five of the city council members need to contact the city manager to request another meeting, and then they need to vote on opening up the discussion to re-vote and stop the demolition of the existing skate park at Condon Park.
Gorman said the group would like to amend the contract with Grindline in order to build a park adjacent to the existing park.
“I don’t believe that an amendment to the contract with Grindline would compromise the grant, Gorman said. “The mayor doesn’t seem to feel that way, and other city council members who are committed to our cause don’t either, as far as I can tell.”
The skate community has been “traditionally underserved for decades,” Gorman said.
The city staff seems committed to working with GVSC moving forward to develop further resources and amenities, and the rest of the city council seems on board with prioritizing more square footage of skate park, according to Gorman.
“The best case scenario is having two parks, which is preserving the existing park, building a new park adjacent to it, and then eventually, with additional funding developed through grants and other resources, to build another addition that will combine those two parks together,” Gorman said.
To contact Staff Writer Marianne Boll-See, email [email protected].