This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.
Politics & Government
The school district is fighting for quality education by opposing the Mayor's historic cuts to local funding support for the schools.
Geoff Epstein, Community Contributor
It is not widely appreciated that a great battle is being waged for the future of quality education in Framingham.
Everyone knows that the pandemic caused a great deal of educational damage to our kids and that repairing that damage is a matter of high priority in every community
In confronting that problem of educational damage, it has been a great benefit in Massachusetts that the state Student Opportunity Act (SOA) passed in November 2019, substantially boosting Chapter 70 state aid for education in school districts across the Commonwealth, with the increased aid finally flowing in FY23 and FY24.
That SOA Chapter 70 state aid boosted funding for students in 3 distinct groups:
All of these groups were impacted by the pandemic more than most, when schools were closed, due to multiple factors:
Find out what's happening in Framinghamfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Framingham was a substantial beneficiary of that increased aid. Here is a chart which shows the Chapter 70 state aid Framingham has received over the years.
Chapter 70 state educational aid is designed to supplement the local taxpayer funded portion of the annual school district budget, which is called the local contribution. So, the total annual school district budget is the sum of the local contribution and the Chapter 70 state aid.
The local contribution can be best characterized as that funding which the state expects each municipality to provide students in its school district to cover the basics of education, including;
Once a city or town has provided that basic educational support, the state kicks in its Chapter 70 funding to address the needs of disadvantaged students. The state not only expects a local contribution from each city and town, but sets a required minimum local contribution which must be met for state Chapter 70 aid to flow.
Here is a chart showing the local contribution for Framingham over the years, which is funded by taxpayer dollars. The local contribution is shown mostly in blue, with the first 3 Sisitsky administration years shown in red. The last data point shown on the curve, in blue, is the amount the School Committee and the school district administration is proposing for FY26, the current budget year under discussion.
Also shown on the plot is the state-required minimum local contribution. One thing to keep in mind is that most school districts fund their local contribution well above the required minimum, as Framingham has done in most years. Any school district whose local contribution is only funded at the minimum amount required by the state is highly correlated with poor performance. Rock bottom funding generally means poor teacher compensation and rock bottom student performance.
That is why the first 3 Sisitsky years are so troubling, as the cuts are so obvious and correlate with a shift of the school district towards worse performance. When compared to the prior local contribution trend, the total amount the Mayor has cut from the local contribution in 3 years comes to about $25 million.
In its current FY26 budget planning, the School Committee wants to continue the push it started last year with the FY25 budget, and that is to get the local contribution back on track at about $93.1 million. The Mayor wants the number to be $4 million less at $89.1 million.
If the Mayor gets his way, he will have reduced the local contribution funding below the FY22 level for each year of his term. That is an unprecedented defunding of education in Framingham.
This completes the financial picture.
The big question is how did the Mayor’s cuts affect Framingham Public Schools education?
The simple fact is that just as the state boosted educational funding for Framingham, the Mayor cut local educational funding for the schools, so he blunted the effect of the increased state aid, to such a degree that the 3 primary problems confronting the school district could not be solved due to lack of funds:
All of these problems could have been solved if the local contribution had been funded properly as it was in pre-Sisitsky years.
The consequences of this are huge and pervade the entire school system in terms of degraded student performance. There has been no pandemic recovery.
Nowhere is this summarized better than in the MCAS performance trends across all Framingham grades for the past several years. Take a look at the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education data at: https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/mcas/mcascharts2.aspx?linkid=33&orgcode=01000000&fycode=2024&orgtypecode=5&
The charts show that for all tested grades: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, English Language Arts performance has gotten worse every year: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.
Here is one of the charts:
One thing is certain.
Given these trends in student performance, and the obvious benefits to students of on-time buses, universal pre-K education, and quality classroom aids, the worst thing to do now is for the School Committee to go along with the Mayor’s $4 million cut to the Framingham Public Schools FY26 budget.
Unusually, the Mayor has turned out to be an adversary for the schools, rather than a partner, in each year of his term.
It is time for the school administration and the School Committee to stand firm on their FY26 budget plans, which put students first, and are an essential ingredient in moving the school district back to a rising trajectory.
Oppose the Mayor’s $4 million cut!!!
The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?