This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.
Politics & Government
The Mayor persists in his scheme to squeeze money out of the school system to solve his infrastructure maintenance backlog problem.
Geoff Epstein, Community Contributor
|Updated Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 8:12 pm ET
Summary
Two years ago, on March 19, 2023, this column began with its first opinion piece:
An Emerging Government Crisis in Framingham
That article is as relevant today as it was then, as it provides vital context for understanding the current set of emerging problems in Framingham education, infrastructure, etc.
A follow up article emphasized the damage being done at that time to the Framingham Public Schools. It explained that disadvantaged students were suffering silently, as boosted state Chapter 70 education funds, fueled by the Student Opportunity Act aimed to help them, were diverted to fix the city’s infrastructure problems in the FY24 budget cycle, just as they had been in the FY23 budget cycle.
Find out what's happening in Framinghamfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Framingham Cuts Education by $10 Million/Year to Fix Infrastructure
At the time no one in the community stirred, because there were no staff cuts.
Now, two years later, we are much further along the road to destroying the school system, as the cuts to the taxpayer funded portion of the school district budget have not been reversed in full measure, and the Mayor doubled down on his attack on school district finances by demanding a $5 million cut in the Framingham Public School FY26 budget.
Now come threatened staff cuts, which would affect every student in the Framingham Public Schools.
The Mayor recently ‘compromised’ by demanding only $2.5 million in schools budget cuts for FY26, but the community should sit up and take notice, as the Mayor, in comments at a recent School Committee meeting, foreshadowed that the FY27 budget would be even more trouble for the schools.
Framingham Mayor Aims for School Budget Cuts This Year AND Next Year
A document showing the staffing cuts which would be carried out to meet the Mayor’s demand for a $2.5 million cut is accessible here:
FY26 Budget Reduction Proposals Memo
This will be discussed by the School Committee at its April 29, 2025, meeting.
By cutting taxpayer funded support for the schools to well below its FY22 level, the Mayor has already shifted at least $25 million away from the schools in the last 3 years to prop up the under-invested and failing city infrastructure. Here again is a key chart which shows the problem.
The FY26 data point on the largely blue line shows what the School Committee voted as part of its FY26 FPS budget. The School Committee is pushing really hard to get its finances back on track after the last 3 years of Sisitsky cuts.
It should hold firm and refuse to fold under the Mayor’s pressure to keep throttling back local school district funding to pour money into his badly managed infrastructure operation.
Here is the candid opinion of the Superintendent, Bob Tremblay, speaking prior to the School Committee approving his FY26 budget in its April 2, 2025, meeting:
Framingham Superintendent Explains The FY26 Budget Bottom Line
The Superintendent’s opinion is reinforced by comments from District 5 School Committee member, Judy Styer, who served as Director of Health and Wellness in the Framingham Public Schools until she retired in 2022. Judy knows, perhaps best of all the School Committee members, what is at stake in this FY26 budget:
Framingham School Committee Member Judy Styer Comments on the FY26 Budget
The school district is arguably the most financially efficient operation in the city, with its local taxpayer funded support rising by roughly 2% annually over the 12 years from 2010 to 2022. It is a travesty that for more than 3 years, the financially well run school district has been viewed by the Mayor and the City Council financial leadership as a source of revenue to prop up the city’s troubled infrastructure.
It is never a good practice to cannibalize your best operation to support your worst operation, quite apart from the fact that pouring money into the sewer system by cutting support for disadvantaged students is a proposition which would not appeal to many people in the Framingham community.
The community needs to step into this fight.
Do Framingham parents think that degrading the Framingham Public School system to fix long neglected city infrastructure is a good trade off?
The Mayor has been hiding the financial problems caused by neglected infrastructure for a while now.
We have all seen rising water & sewer rates which only provide a temporary fix for the giant $400 million infrastructure maintenance backlog the city has built up. The Mayor avoids informing the community that rates will have to be raised steeply again in several years to fund the $50 million/year in new work on the water & sewer system which must be done for the foreseeable future. See the consultant’s report which lays this out at:
FY 2025 Water and Sewer Rate Study
Page 9 has a table which show that water & sewer finances go back into deficit in just a few years.
The path ahead is quite simple.
The Mayor needs to find a sustainable funding source for fixing the city infrastructure. He cannot keep sucking $5 million/year out of the school system budget. We will have no school system left if he follows that path.
There are two options available to the Mayor:
The Mayor needs to honestly address the financial problems facing the city, and present a plan to the City Council and to the community. For too long the real problems facing the city have been hidden from the public view.
Every parent opposed to cutting the schools’ budget to put a small dent in the city’s runaway infrastructure backlog, should turn up to the School Committee meeting on April 29, 2025, to let the School Committee know it should stand firm on its budget, and force the Mayor to find a better solution for his cityside infrastructure problems.
It is worth observing that the Framingham School Committee is not alone in fighting to make sure that Student Opportunity Act funding ends up in the classroom, not diverted to other cityside purposes.
The Marlborough Mayor and City Council Are Also Engaged in Short-Changing Disadvantaged Students
The City of Marlborough, with its Mayor and Council, has been engaged in the same egregious diversion practices as the City of Framingham. They also used the method of reducing local taxpayer support for Marlborough schools to divert Student Opportunity Act money away from students.
That money went, among other things, to fund tax cuts. In FY24, the Marlborough property tax levy was cut by almost $6 million. All of that at the expense of students.
The Marlborough and Framingham School Committees are fighting the same fight.
See this article from the MetroWest Daily News:
Marlborough school board wants 11.1% budget increase. Why members say it's justified
Here is a quote from that article.
‘Committee Vice-Chairwoman Michelle Bodin-Hettinger, said money that comes in from the state’s Student Opportunity Act is sent to the city and, since 2021, the amount spent on the schools has decreased.
“The Student Opportunity Act is supposed to help our students and we’re not getting the money,” she said.”'
The trend of the taxpayer funded contribution to the Marlborough Public Schools budget, shows the exactly the same pattern as in Framingham, with deep cuts when Student Opportunity Act funding rolled in during FY23 and FY24:
Just as with Framingham the last point on the curve: 2026, shows the place the Marlborough School Committee is aiming for in its FY26 budget in an attempt to get back to the trend before the Mayor’s cuts.
In some sense, it is remarkable that the Marlborough Public Schools (MPS) are still afloat, as even prior to FY22 the taxpayer funded portion of the MPS budget was almost flat for 10 years, and 98% of the budget increases were funded by inflowing Chapter 70 funds.
Since this practice of subverting the intent of the Student Opportunity Act has been engaged in by both Framingham and Marlborough, it seems time for both city teachers’ unions, the MTA, DESE, MASC and our state delegation to come to the defense of these two school systems and their students.
Educational justice needs to be served.
Note
MTA = Massachusetts Teachers Association
DESE = Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
MASC = Massachusetts Association of School Committees
The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?