HARTFORD — A former psychiatrist at Manchester Memorial Hospital is alleging Prospect Medical Holdings engaged in insurance fraud by not discharging psychiatric patients who no longer required hospitalization in order to continue collecting insurance revenue, including federal Medicare and Medicaid dollars.
The lawsuit filed by Lawrence Peacock adds to Prospect's mounting legal challenges as the for-profit, California-based health care system is embroiled in a lawsuit with Yale New Haven Health over the proposed $435 million sale of Manchester, Rockville General, and Waterbury hospitals.
Nina Kruse, spokeswoman for Eastern Connecticut Health Network, which is owned by Prospect, would not comment Tuesday due to pending litigation.
Peacock, who was ultimately terminated from his position as medical director and vice chairman of the hospital's psychiatric department, filed a lawsuit in July 2020 in Hartford Superior Court. A trial is scheduled for next month with jury selection underway, according to the state's judicial website.
More For You
A judge denied Prospect's motion for summary judgment in December.
In his role, Peacock was responsible for overseeing a 24-bed psychiatric unit at the hospital.
When Prospect took over ownership of Manchester Hospital in 2016, Peacock was told by his supervisor that his bosses would "stay off (his) back" as long as he maintained occupancy in the psychiatric unit at a minimum of 20 out of the 24 beds, according to the lawsuit.
For every day that a patient was admitted in the unit, Prospect was able to bill insurers, including government-funded insurers such as Medicare and Medicaid, for the patient's stay, thereby generating money for Prospect and its shareholders, according to the lawsuit.
"The implicit subtext" of Peacock's supervisor's comment, according to the lawsuit, was that Peacock should maintain the number of patients admitted to the psychiatric unit so that Prospect "could bill for its services, whether it was medically warranted or not."
On one day in 2018, according to the lawsuit, Peacock discharged between nine and 10 patients from the unit when the patients' admission was no longer medically warranted.
A short time later, Peacock's direct supervisor told him that he had been directed by a national vice president of development for Prospect to issue a warning to Peacock for doing "too many discharges in one day," which had caused the patient census to drop "too low," according to the lawsuit.
Peacock and other health care providers in the psychiatric unit were later instructed not to discharge any more than three patients per day, according to the lawsuit.
In July 2019, Peacock filed a complaint with the Connecticut attorney general's office, alleging patients were kept in the psychiatric unit when it was not medically necessary in order to pad Prospect's profits, which would constitute insurance fraud.
In January 2020, Peacock made a similar complaint internally to Prospect, and he was terminated from his position a short time later.
He is suing for lost wages, emotional distress, attorney fees, and wrongful termination.
Elizabeth Benton, spokeswoman for Attorney General William Tong, said Tuesday that the attorney general's office has an "active and ongoing investigation into Prospect Medical."
"That includes neither confirming nor denying these allegations as a component of that investigation," she said.
According to court documents, Prospect argues that Peacock was terminated as a result of "obstreperous and unprofessional conduct, lack of cooperation and collaboration with colleagues, and insubordination."
Prospect further argues that Peacock's "complaint about its census policies had nothing to do with his termination."
According to court documents, Prospect said Peacock remained medical director, continued to receive retention bonuses, and was offered a draft renewal contract that included a raise.
Prospect argues Peacock was reprimanded for using profanity and having inappropriate interactions with other behavioral health unit physicians and staff members.
Following a human resources investigation, Peacock was suspended with pay, and subsequently refused to return to work, according to court documents supporting Prospect's case.
Prospect argues Peacock was terminated because Manchester Hospital and Prospect could not reach an agreement on his contract renewal despite trying to do so for an extended period of time.