This election, three constitutional amendments appear on the ballot for all voters, and the Durham City Council wants people to vote against all of them.
Late Monday night, the council unanimously approved a resolution urging residents to reject the three proposed amendments, arguing they could limit government revenue options and make it harder to respond to local needs.
If passed, the amendments would:
The council says the tax measures could constrain funding for services and investments in schools, public safety, roads, affordable housing and infrastructure.
Durham Mayor Leo Williams said the point of the resolution is to get “the word out across the state as much as possible.”
“I hope that North Carolina votes no on these constitutional amendments. I want to be very clear about that,” he said during the meeting. “We don’t govern in resolution, but, you know, some things that are regarding city business, we try to you know just at least position our stance on things.”
What Durham’s resolution says
The resolution says constitutional amendments are harder to change than ordinary laws. Changing amendments requires three-fifths support in both the state House and Senate and approval by a majority of voters. The document also argues tax rates and fiscal policy should be handled through legislation, which can be adjusted more easily.
The first proposed amendment to cap the state income-tax rate at 3.5% would not change much. The current rate is 3.99%, while the existing constitutional cap is 7%. The proposal doesn’t lower the current rate but instead, would set a lower ceiling. State law already provides for potential rate reductions below 3.5% beginning in 2027. A lower constitutional cap, the resolution states, would reduce future lawmakers’ options for funding education, public safety, healthcare, state parks and disaster recovery.
The second proposed amendment (requiring the General Assembly to limit how much local governments can increase total property-tax revenue) could constrain Durham’s ability to address infrastructure, affordable housing, public safety and other needs, specifically as economic conditions change or emergencies come up, the resolution states.
The third proposed amendment would require every voter to have a photo ID. This is already required to vote in elections in North Carolina, but opponents argue voter ID laws can disproportionately affect minority communities and make voting harder for military, student, rural and older voters, along with others who may lack qualifying identification, the resolution states.
Councilman Carl Rist urged Durham voters to vote against the proposals.
“The property tax amendment in particular, if passed, would be just a generational change in how we function at the local level and our ability to raise revenue for all the things,” he said.
One resident, Pablo Friedmann, backed the resolution but also called on the city to address local commercial property valuation decisions he said had reduced city and county tax rolls. Williams said he was working to schedule a Board of Equalization Review presentation for the council.
Over 33,000 voters cast early ballots in Durham
Since the first day of early voting began on Oct. 15 across the state, over 33,000 eligible voters have cast ballots in Durham County, according to the local Board of Elections. There are 252,211 eligible voters in the county.
Statewide, about 486,000 North Carolinians have cast ballots early, a 50% higher turnout than by this time during the last midterm election cycle.
Williams encouraged residents to “vote as soon as you can.”
Early voting ends on Oct. 31. Election Day is Nov. 3.