Fairfax city officials want to weigh in, say such a plant could boost the city’s economy
The Gazette offers audio versions of articles using Instaread. Some words may be mispronounced.
CEDAR RAPIDS — Members of the Cedar Rapids Airport Commission told Alliant Energy representatives that they feel “blindsided” by the company’s proposal to build a gas-fired plant on land adjacent to The Eastern Iowa Airport.
“I feel like you checked us against the glass on this deal,” airport commission’s past chair Barry Boyer told Alliant Energy representatives at a Tuesday morning meeting.
The Eastern Iowa Airport Director Marty Lenss said the airport staff was made aware June 18 of a desire by Alliant Energy to build a plant adjacent to the Travero facility in Fairfax. Travero is a subsidiary of Alliant Energy.
Alliant Energy Senior Project Manager Eric Curtis told the commission the facility would be a natural gas fired generation plant with two stacks rising 190 to 250 feet above the ground.
Curtis said each stack would connect to a combustion turbine in the facility, and each would produce a plume.
He said the plant also would have a water cooling system that would use about 1/20 the amount of water a standard water cooler uses.
“We do have an obligation to provide energy to our customers, both existing and new customers, and we need to do that reliably and cost affordably,” said Dave Herkert, assistant vice president of strategic projects for Alliant. “So, we look at multiple options in order to do that today. We're going to be talking about some projects and some alternative, potential alternative sites, and we'll be looking at treating those with the same focus on safety, complying with laws and permits, reliability and customer affordability.”
Lenss said the plumes would create additional hazards, such as fogs, and the stacks would create a vertical obstruction in the airport’s “critical approach to departure” landing area of the airport.
“Siting a power plant at the proposed location is not compatible with the current and future operations, and the airport is asking that the site be removed from further consideration,” Lenss said. “The airport is ready to assist and work with Alliant to determine alternative sites that would be compatible with airport operations and really flip the script on this and make it a ‘win-win’ solution.”
At a commission meeting last week, members of the airport commission agreed to pursue a study looking at potential impacts of the proposed plant. The study will cost the airport just over $67,000, and will take several months to complete.
Details about the project’s site
Alliant has said there are other potential locations identified for the project, but the company’s representatives declined to share those locations with the commission because if they disclose the other sites, they said that information could put the company in a “negative position from a cost perspective” as it continues its evaluations of potential sites.
Although Alliant is evaluating other locations for the project, company representatives didn’t take filing with the Iowa Utilities Commission in October off the table during Tuesday morning’s meeting. That timeline remains “fluid” as Alliant continues working with stakeholders and completes alternative sites analyses, Curtis said.
Alliant representatives said that a project filed with the IUC must have the final project site determined. They expected a decision could take more than a year and construction would take about three years, company officials said.
The proposed location in Fairfax would construct the plant four miles from the end of the airport’s main runway, less than three miles from the current secondary runway and less than two miles from a proposed future third runway.
If the project is approved and the plant is built, Lenss said it will impact the airport.
“There's no other way to say it, (this) will negatively impact this airport's ability to grow in the future, and will have negative impacts on operations,” Lenss said. He pointed specifically to the plumes the plant would create, which he said could cause “real safety of flight issues.”
As of Tuesday, the airport commission had received multiple letters about the proposal — both before and after the meeting. The letters, obtained by The Gazette through a public records request, all opposed the project.
Michael Gries, senior director of Certification & Airworthiness at Collins Aerospace said the company has had the “good fortune” to be an aviation tenant for the airport for the past 80 years, saying the business as grown alongside CID. The proposed site would create vertical obstruction hazards for pilots in critical times during flight processes, thermal plumes and wake effects, potential electromagnetic interference and other potential negative impacts, he said in his letter.
“The combination of hazards to aircraft put aircrews and passengers at unnecessary risk,” Gries wrote. “The proposed facility also undermines decades of careful airport planning.”
Resident Peter Nielsen wrote to the board to ask about a more appropriate site for the plant.
“With Google’s build in CR, are there any innovations or beneficial advantages that could be offered as advantageous?” Nielsen wrote, referring to the Google data center that’s being built near the airport. “Otherwise, I see NO reason to allow this site selection as it could/would limit growth options for CR airport expansion.”
Walford resident Todd Gibbs wrote to the commission expressing “deep concern and opposition” to the location of Alliant’s proposed plant. Gibbs, who has spent 35 years in aviation — including serving in the U.S. Air Force — said he’s concerned the plumes would create a hazard.
“I strongly urge decision-makers at Alliant to remove the Fairfax/Travero site from further consideration and to direct the project to a location that does not compromise aviation safety or limit the airport's future,” Gibbs wrote. “In the event they don't, I urge the Iowa Utilities Board to consider the damaging impact to the airport as a vital public asset when weighing their decision to allow the siting of this plant. It would seem ill advised to risk the viability of an established public asset for that of a power plant with alternative sitting locations yet to be built.”
Lenss said the Federal Aviation Administration will not weigh in on the project.
“Local communities must decide local land use issues, and the FAA will hold the airport accountable via grant assurances, should the airport and the community make poor decisions and not protect the federal investment in the airport through compatible land use protections,” Lenss said.
He added that “plumes are not something the FAA would even render,” but if the situation were reversed and the commission wanted to build an airport next to the power plant, they would not be allowed to do so.
Fairfax officials want to be involved in discussion
City officials from Fairfax are asking to be included in the decision making process about the plant.
“We were also kind of blindsided by the airport commission wanting to reject (Alliant’s proposal) automatically before the studies are in,” Chris Phillips, zoning administrator for the City Fairfax, said during public comment at Tuesday’s meeting. “It does abide by the FAA regulations. … This is an excellent opportunity for Fairfax for economic development.”
However, Fairfax Mayor Jo Ann Beer told the commission that the city is “not yet positioned to offer an opinion” on the project and still is in the information gathering phase.
“The only presentation by Alliant so far has been to our planning and building commission and to a small group of council members and staff. At this point in time, there's no scheduled Alliant presentations (to) the city council. The city council will have the ultimate decision in this process, gathering information and proceeding slowly is of utmost importance to the community of Fairfax,” Beer said. “We want to be good partners in all of this and also protect the interests of our community.”
Fairfax is expected to discuss the issue at its Aug. 12 council meeting and at a planning and zoning commission meeting later this month, city officials said.
Olivia Cohen covers energy and environment for The Gazette and is a corps member with Report for America, a national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on under-covered issues. She is also a contributing writer for the Ag and Water Desk, an independent journalism collaborative focusing on the Mississippi River Basin.