Three candidates are running for two at-large seats on the Pleasant Hill City Council in the Nov. 4 election.
The ballot includes Andrew Birch, Austin Bittner and Alyson DeMoss, each seeking a four-year term. No incumbents are running for reelection.
The Des Moines Register asked each candidate to respond to questions on why they're running and the issues their city is facing. Their answers may be lightly edited for clarity or length.
Everything to know about Des Moines metro school board, council races for 2025 election
Andrew Birch
Age: 40
Grew up: Born and raised in Altoona. Moved to Pleasant Hill in 2009.
Education: I graduated from Southeast Polk High school in 2003. Graduated with an associate's degree from DMACC in general studies in 2008. Telecommunications journeyman/BISCI technician in 2016.
Occupation: Technology division manager at Armor Electric
Political experience: I was honored to serve as a firefighter and EMT for the Pleasant Hill Fire Department from 2009–2016 and 2019–2022. I currently serve on the Pleasant Hill Soccer Club board, supporting youth and community engagement. I also serve as a deacon at Rising Sun Church of Christ, where I’m committed to serving both my church family and the Pleasant Hill community.
Austin Bittner
Age: 31
Grew up: Mitchellville
Education: Bachelor's, Grand View University
Occupation: Real estate agent
Political Experience: I’ve served Pleasant Hill through the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, Parks & Recreation Commission, and the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. My work has focused on community growth, economic development, and quality of life initiatives. These roles reflect my commitment to service and give me valuable experience for City Council.
Alyson DeMoss
Age: 42
Grew up: St. Cloud, Minnesota
Education: Associate's, St. Cloud State University
Occupation: Small business owner, government relations specialist, and executive director of a statewide professional association.
Political experience: My interest in politics began very early on when I volunteered on a gubernatorial campaign. Since then, I’ve helped shape state policy as a government affairs professional and executive director of a statewide association, building coalitions to solve complex issues. I previously served as a court appointed special advocate and now serve on the Pleasant Hill Public Arts Commission.
Why are you running?
Andrew Birch: My time serving with the Pleasant Hill Fire Department, while raising my family, gave me a unique perspective on public safety. I understand the challenges our first responders face and am committed to supporting them. Pleasant Hill has been a safe community for my family, and I want to ensure future families thrive in a secure environment. I’m also running to promote smart economic development, growing our local business community for the benefit of residents. Finally, I aim to ensure families are well-supported by addressing community issues promptly, ensuring efficient snow removal, and working to bring down property taxes.
Austin Bittner: I’m running for Pleasant Hill City Council because I care deeply about the future of our community. Through my work with the Chamber of Commerce, Parks & Recreation Commission, and the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, I’ve seen both the opportunities and challenges our city faces. Pleasant Hill is growing, and with that growth comes important decisions about how we plan, invest, and lead. I want to bring fresh energy and a collaborative spirit to the council so residents know their voices are heard. My goal is simple: to see Pleasant Hill thrive today and for the next generation.
Alyson DeMoss: I’m running because Pleasant Hill deserves a clear identity, growth that lifts everyone, and a future where families can thrive. We have a chance to define who we are, guide development so it strengthens every neighborhood, and responsibly invest in the services and spaces that make this a great place to live. With years of experience building coalitions and shaping policy, I’ll work to keep Pleasant Hill moving forward with purpose.
What is the most important issue facing your city and what would you do to address it?
Andrew Birch: Pleasant Hill is my home, and I value the tight-knit community we’ve built. But as the city grows, we must be ready to meet increasing demands. To remain a place families and businesses are proud to call home, we need to expand commercial opportunities. A key way to support growth and strengthen our tax base is by attracting new businesses. I bring a fiscally conservative mindset — focused on reducing unnecessary spending and using our budget more efficiently. This approach allows us to invest in services and infrastructure while preserving the small-town character that makes Pleasant Hill special.
Austin Bittner: The most important issue facing Pleasant Hill is managing growth in a way that benefits everyone who calls our city home. Pleasant Hill is expanding, and with that comes big decisions about housing, infrastructure, parks, and the businesses we welcome. Growth is exciting, but it can also put pressure on services if it isn’t planned carefully. My focus would be making sure development adds value for current and future residents, that infrastructure keeps pace with demand, and that Pleasant Hill continues to succeed as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community
Alyson DeMoss: Pleasant Hill is growing quickly, but a new state cap limits the revenue we can collect from that growth. As a growing small city within a large county, our challenges differ from surrounding communities, making it essential to define our identity. That clarity will guide future policy discussions and help us shape growth with intention.
How would you balance a desire to lower property taxes with a need to provide resources to your city?
Andrew Birch: Property taxes are too high. I'm dedicated to working with city officials, community leaders, residents, schools, and the state government to find a balanced, practical solution — one that ensures we continue to fund vital services (first responders and municipal services) while providing meaningful tax relief. If we want to attract and retain families in Pleasant Hill, we must make sure our community remains affordable. No one should feel forced out of their home — especially when it's already paid off — due to rising property taxes. There's always room for improvement, and I’m committed to managing our tax dollars with the same care and responsibility that I apply to my own family’s budget.
Austin Bittner: Balancing property taxes with city resources means being smart with both growth and spending. Recent state legislation has limited how much revenue cities can capture, which makes it even more important to be strategic at our local level. I believe we can keep Pleasant Hill affordable for families while still providing the services people count on by focusing on two things: encouraging responsible economic development to grow our tax base and prioritizing investments that deliver the most impact. Strong fiscal management is about making thoughtful choices so residents see real value for every dollar while ensuring our community thrives.
Alyson DeMoss: Lowering property taxes only works if we can still protect the services people count on. I’d keep spending responsible and focused while promoting smart growth to expand our tax base. We also need to stay at the table with state leaders on the cap they set for local revenue so we can keep pace with growth and still invest in safety, infrastructure, and basic necessities while accounting for increased costs. Many people who grew up here are now moving back to raise their own families. They expect us to keep the Pleasant Hill that they love safe, well-kept, and ready for generations to come.
Nick El Hajj is a reporter at the Register. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on X at @nick_el_hajj.