Residents urged Brick Township officials to revisit the town's ordinance on trailers after small business owners say they've been cited.
Patch Staff
|Updated Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 4:49 pm ET
BRICK, NJ — Owners of several small businesses in Brick Township are urging officials to revise the town's ordinances regarding storage trailers, after what they say are a slew of code violation notices issued in recent weeks.
At issue are the township's ordinances governing where and what types of trailers can be parked in town. The rules, primarily addressed in Chapter 445, Article II of the township's codes, bar parking of covered trailers used for storage on residential property. Storage trailer parking for commercial properties is addressed in Chapter 288.
The rules bar enclosed storage trailers from being parked on residential property, with some exceptions for temporary storage units rented during a home renovation. Also exempted are recreational vehicles, boat trailers and open landscaping trailers.
Enclosed storage trailers also are barred from commercial property unless they have been approved as part of the site plan.
The Chapter 445 ordinance has been on the township's books since 1974. In December, a proposal to amend the ordinance was put on the council's agenda, but it was withdrawn after a public outcry over its restrictions.
Find out what's happening in Brickfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
On Tuesday night, residents say a number of violation notices have been issued for enclosed storage containers in recent weeks, many of them to owners of small businesses and in some cases, after years of existing usage.
Tom Finelli, owner of Finelli's Landscaping, said he received violation notices for enclosed storage trailers on his commercial site, even though they had been on the site for years.
The trailers are not visible from the street, Finelli said, and he had checked with the township as he prepared to open his business to make sure he was in compliance and was assured by the zoning department that the storage trailers were parked legally.
Mayor Lisa Crate and township attorney Kevin Starkey said it appeared he had been cited incorrectly and would investigate.
"I feel like I've been targeted," Finelli said, and said there were 28 commercial businesses that were cited. That number could not immediately be verified late Tuesday.
Art Hasselbach, who spoke out in December against the scrapped ordinance revision, said he has been dealing with issues because someone has continuously complained about his property, and expressed frustration over what he viewed as harassment.
He noted that he uses an enclosed storage trailer for his motorcycle as he does not have room to store it elsewhere on his property, and said the ordinance as it exists creates a burden for people who have antique cars or jetskis or other craft that need to be protected from the elements when they're not in use.
Mike Kleissler, who also spoke in December against the scrapped ordinance, urged Crate and township officials to revise the ordinance, saying it hurts business owners like him who have special equipment that require trailers.
Kleissler, who is a retired New Jersey State Trooper, said he dealt with trailer enforcement and offered to assist in helping to revise the ordinance. He also urged the town to put a moratorium on trailer violations until the matter can be sorted out.
The scrapped ordinance in December drew attention to the town's rules, Crate said.
"It really wasn’t an issue until we tried to clarify to our code enforcement," she said. "People realizing it (the existence of the ordinance) are now calling and complaining."
Crate added in response to the question that she didn't have a list of names of who had been calling. '"I’m not looking at the call logs," she said.
Starkey said the ordinance revision that was presented in December was a result of questions from the township's code enforcement officials seeking clarification of the rules, and Starkey said he was the one responsible for adding it to the agenda at the last minute.
Starkey reiterated that the proposed revision that was on the December council meeting is dead and was not being brought back, in spite of social media claims otherwise. An anonymous poster on Tuesday claimed in a Brick community Facebook group that the ordinance was back on the council agenda and then removed. A copy of the agenda emailed to media outlets on Friday had no ordinance introductions listed.
Crate said town officials will revisit the 1974 ordinance.
"We’re obviously going to be looking at this," she said. "We're not here to hurt small business."
Editor's note: This article has been updated to correct the employment status of Mike Kleissler, who is retired. Patch regrets the error.