KEYPORT, N.J. (PIX11) — Nine soil samples. Four above an EPA screening level for dioxins. Four above the screening level for a cancer-linked chemical.
Those are the preliminary results an independent testing team brought to a Keyport town hall Wednesday night, in a community where residents count around 400 cancer cases near an old industrial site and landfill. PIX11 obtained the lab reports and summary tables behind the presentation.
Stay connected with community stories that matter: Visit our homepage
Four of nine locations exceeded the EPA regional screening level for benzo[a]pyrene, a known carcinogen. The highest reading was 350 micrograms per kilogram, about three times the 110 threshold. Four locations also exceeded the dioxin screening level of 4.8 parts per trillion, the highest at 19.3.
Screening levels are a trigger for further investigation. The results do not establish that the chemicals came from the landfill, that people were exposed or that they caused cancer.
“I’m the sampler. I work with the experts,” said Scott Smith, who collected the samples. “I am not here to say cause and effect.”
Who did the testing
Smith founded the nonprofit Blue Shirt Justice League and also runs a company that sells contamination testing and cleanup technology. Residents brought him in to test properties around Keyport, including places he says the state has not sampled. The samples were analyzed by ALS Environmental and Eurofins.
“The difference is from the state test and my test is that I am testing in basements and properties they are not testing,” Smith said. “The state, if they test the exact same locations that I test, they are going to get the same results.”
PCBs were below the screening level at all nine locations. “The good news is we had virtually no PFAS in the soil,” Smith said of the long-lasting chemicals sometimes called forever chemicals.
Metals were less clear. Arsenic came in at 56 to 180 parts per million at three locations; Smith’s report notes natural background can reach 40. Lead exceeded the EPA residential screening level of 200 parts per million at four locations, including a reading of 1,400 in soil exposed in one basement. The yard outside the same house measured 14.
Smith called the metals results “very tricky” and said he was still double-checking some findings with the lab.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has said there is no suggestion contamination is leaving the site and no pathway for exposure, according to Kati Angarone, the department’s chief strategy officer, in a June interview with NewsNation. Smith disputes that. On Wednesday he called the site “an unlined toxic waste pit” that he says state records show accepted chemical waste as early as 1975.
The site was once home to Aeromarine, where flying boats and seaplanes were built. It later became a landfill that closed decades ago.
Kevin Garrahan, a health risk assessor who spent nearly four decades at the EPA and has worked alongside Smith before, told residents a 2010 study conducted under state oversight found benzene and vinyl chloride in soil gas at 50 to 60 times New Jersey’s vapor intrusion standards.
That 2010 finding is the basis for the theory the team is now investigating: contaminants move with groundwater over many years, and vapors then enter basements through cracks in foundations.
Air monitoring in Keyport basements began Thursday.
“We may not find anything,” a member of the team told the crowd. “But if it’s there, we will find.”
‘Aeromarine is my backyard’
Karen Dunn lives next to the site.
“Aeromarine is my backyard. I have had five animals with cancer,” Dunn said. “My one dog had bone cancer in his leg, then my other dog, bone cancer in the leg. My other dog had gum cancer, and my two cats had cat leukemia. Is it a coincidence? It’s kind of scary.”
Diane Brinkley has been asking a version of the same question about herself.
“In 2019 I was diagnosed with plasma cell leukemia. I relapsed in 2024,” Brinkley said. “I want to know whether any of that can be attributed to any of this.”
Nothing presented Wednesday established that contamination from the site caused those illnesses.
What happens next
Smith said the team plans to test surface water, possibly groundwater, and basements.
For Brinkley, Dunn and others in Keyport, the question is the same one they have been asking for years: whether anything from the old site ever reached the places where they live.