WAYNE, NJ – What would Wayne’s school board candidates need to see before approving another school tax increase? In this second article in an eight-part series, the six candidates explain how they would evaluate that decision and discuss it with residents who are struggling to afford living in Wayne.
TAPinto Wayne sent the same eight questions to all six candidates running for three seats on the Board of Education. The first article asked them to introduce themselves and share their qualifications. This article focuses on school taxes.
The candidates, listed in the order their responses appear below, are:
Sign Up for FREE Wayne Newsletter
Get local news you can trust in your inbox.
The first article followed the candidates’ ballot order, determined by a random draw performed by the Passaic County Clerk’s office. With each new article, the candidate whose response appeared first moves to the bottom, and everyone else moves up one position.
All their comments/answers will be presented without editing and published in full.
A school tax increase should never be automatic. Before voting for one, I would first need to understand exactly what is driving the increase and why it is necessary. That means looking carefully at the district’s spending, enrollment projections, staffing and contractual obligations, special education costs, facilities needs, state aid, reserves, and potential areas for savings. I would also want to understand what alternatives were considered and what the impact of those alternatives would be on students and schools.
For me, fiscal responsibility is not simply about spending less. We also have to look at the consequences of the decisions we make. For example, a cut that results in larger class sizes, eliminates an important student service, or creates a greater expense a few years from now may save money in one budget cycle without being fiscally responsible in the long run. That is why I believe the Board has to consider the financial and educational impact together.
At the same time, we cannot discuss school budgets without recognizing the financial pressure many Wayne residents are already experiencing. Seniors on fixed incomes, young families, and longtime homeowners all feel the effect of increasing property taxes. If I were going to vote for an increase, I would need to be convinced that the district had carefully examined its options first. More importantly, I would need to be able to explain to residents, in clear and specific terms, why the increase was necessary, what their money would support, and what had been done to control costs.
Ultimately, residents deserve more than being told that an increase is necessary. They deserve to understand the reasoning behind it and to see how their tax dollars are being used.
I understand the frustration surrounding this year's school tax increase of more than 8%, especially for seniors on fixed incomes, young families, and longtime residents who are finding it increasingly difficult to afford to live in Wayne. I have lived here my entire life, raised my family here, and pay the same property taxes as everyone else. I recognize that every increase places an additional burden on our residents, and I do not take that responsibility lightly.
Residents also deserve to understand what drove this year's increase. The district faced extraordinary financial pressures, including an approximately 34% increase in healthcare costs, rising utilities, increasing special education expenses, and what I believe continues to be inadequate state funding for Wayne. We have taken steps to control spending, including reducing administrative positions while increasing teaching positions to keep resources focused on our classrooms. However, when major expenses continue to rise and state funding fails to keep pace, more of that financial burden falls on local taxpayers.
Before I would support another tax increase, I would expect detailed justification of every additional dollar requested. I would like to know what expenses have been reduced, what alternatives have been considered, and what impact further cuts would have on our students. My more than 20 years on the Board have also taught me that cutting an expense today does not always save taxpayers money tomorrow. Postponing necessary repairs or making short-term decisions without considering their long-term consequences can ultimately cost residents significantly more. This is also why I supported establishing the Citizen Budget Advisory Committee, so residents have a meaningful opportunity to understand our financial challenges, ask questions, and provide input before the final budget is presented.
To residents who are struggling to afford living in Wayne, I would say this: I hear you, and you deserve more than an explanation that costs have gone up. You deserve accountability. If I vote for a budget that increases taxes, I have an obligation to explain where that money is going, why it is necessary, what alternatives we considered, and what we did to minimize the increase. I will not automatically support a tax increase, nor will I promise to oppose one simply because it may be the popular answer. Every budget must stand on its own merits, and every dollar must be justified. My responsibility is to protect the quality of education our children receive while respecting the taxpayers who make that education possible.
Before voting to approve a budget that would unfortunately raise school taxes again, I would have to be confident that there’s a renewed dedication to require smart budgeting, eliminating waste, responsible resource allocation, accountability, transparency and assurance that there’s a prudent approach to ALL spending. While seated as a trustee on the school board I’ve come to learn that the state’s disproportionate funding has left us in a challenging situation, at best. I think stakeholders in Wayne deserve a board that can make tough decisions in tough times that will benefit our students and ensure continued academic excellence while carefully considering all tax-payors, as well.
Affordability is a significant and real concern in Wayne, and I understand the challenge. The reality is that contractual obligations — primarily salaries and benefits — will add to the rising school budget each year. Employee health insurance costs alone have increased by nearly 34%. At the same time, Wayne home values have appreciated substantially. A strong school system has helped protect and build homeowners’ investment and equity, and it will continue to do so.
This is a challenge that hits home for me because I live in Wayne and pay property taxes like everyone else. I have become increasingly convinced during my three years on the Board that the current system is not aligned with the realities facing our district. State funding, regulations, and mandates often do not reflect the costs and challenges that Wayne faces, leaving local taxpayers to absorb much of the difference.
My experience on the Board has also taught me that the range of choices available to a school district is often much narrower than residents might reasonably expect. Early in my first term, I had many ideas that seemed practical until I learned that state law, regulations, contracts, or other requirements prevented the district from pursuing them. Understanding those limitations has given me a much clearer picture of where the Board actually has the ability to make meaningful changes.
Before I would support another tax increase above the statutory cap, I would need to be convinced that it is necessary and that, over the long term, it is a better choice for the district and taxpayers than the alternatives available to us. That means thoroughly examining the budget, identifying areas where costs can be reduced or deferred, and understanding the consequences of each available option.
I would explain my decision to residents the same way I approach decisions on the Board: by being transparent about the options that were actually available, the advantages and disadvantages of each, the potential downstream consequences, and ultimately why I believed one option was more responsible than the others.
I understand why residents ask, “Why didn’t the Board just do this?” or “Why didn’t they cut that?” Those are fair questions. My experience has taught me that some of the simplest and most logical solutions are not legally or practically available to a school district. That does not mean the Board is powerless. It means our responsibility is to understand the choices we actually have, challenge the assumptions behind them, and make the most responsible decisions possible with the options available.
After an increase of more than 8% this year, I think the bar for asking Wayne taxpayers for even more money next year needs to be extremely high.
Before I could support another tax increase, I would need to be convinced that we had gone through the budget thoroughly, line by line, and exhausted reasonable alternatives. I would want to know where our costs have increased, why they have increased, what we have done to control those costs, and whether there are areas where we are spending money without getting enough value in return.
I would also want to know what the consequences of not raising taxes would actually be. If I'm being told that without an increase we're going to lose teachers, significantly increase class sizes, or eliminate programs and services that our students truly need, that's something I have to take seriously. But I don't think we should start the budget process by deciding how much more we can ask taxpayers for and then building a budget around that number.
Wayne is an expensive place to live. We have retirees on fixed incomes, young families trying to afford their first home, and longtime residents who have watched their property taxes continue to climb. An 8% increase isn't just a number in a budget presentation. That's real money coming out of someone's wallet every month.
At the same time, I wouldn't make a campaign promise that I will never vote for a tax increase. I don't think that would be responsible either. There may be circumstances where an increase really is necessary to protect the quality of education we provide our children. If that happens, I would need to be able to look residents in the eye and explain exactly why I voted for it, what alternatives we considered, what we cut or changed first, and specifically where their additional money is going.
If I can't explain that clearly to our residents who are being asked to pay the bill, then I won't be voting for it.
I recognize that an increase of this magnitude puts real pressure on Wayne families. Before supporting another significant increase, I would want to understand exactly what is driving it, what costs are unavoidable, what efficiencies have been identified, and what measurable benefit students and taxpayers should expect.
I would also want to see how staffing, class sizes, state aid, grants, maintenance and other major expenses are being evaluated. A budget should demonstrate that we are spending responsibly before asking taxpayers to spend more.
If an increase were ultimately necessary, I would explain the decision honestly. We need to distinguish between simply spending more and making necessary investments. Residents deserve to know what they are paying for, why it is necessary, what alternatives were considered and how the Board will measure results.
At the same time, we cannot lose sight of families who are struggling with the cost of living in Wayne. Fiscal responsibility and educational excellence have to exist together.
Past and Upcoming Articles in This Series: