A luxury property rental company denies the allegations of a couple who claim it abruptly pulled the plug a month before their wedding.
LOS ANGELES, CA — In new court papers, a luxury property rental company denies the allegations of a couple who claim it abruptly pulled the plug a month before their scheduled summer 2024 wedding at a lavish Malibu mansion that promised electrifying views, ample parking and space for numerous overnight guests.
Shane Foley and Leah Sanfilippo filed the suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Living the Dream and the various owners of the property on Piuma Road. The pair's allegations include breach of contract, fraud, false advertising and negligence. Foley and Sanfilippo seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
In court papers filed Sept. 5 with Judge Holly J. Fujie, attorneys for Living the Dream state that their client committed no wrongdoing.
"After plaintiffs failed to pay the balance of the deposit timely, and after unforeseen circumstances, (Living the Dream was) forced to cancel the event," the defense lawyers state in their court papers. "As per the contract, a full refund was provided for the partial deposit paid."
But the couple's attorneys tell a different story in the suit filed last Oct. 23.
"Plaintiffs were deprived of the opportunity to look forward to one of the most important days of their lives and were instead left scrambling to ensure that they did not have to cancel their wedding entirely," the suit states, adding that the couple's "dream wedding quickly turned into a nightmare."
LTD's conduct has resulted in significant financial and emotional damage to the couple because they had to endure substantial expense in making last-minute arrangements to ensure that their wedding could go ahead, according to the suit, which describes the plaintiff's demeanor upon learning of the cancellation as "distraught."
LTD advertises the property on its website for $65,000 a month and a minimum of $3,000 per night while dubbing the mansion they leased from the property owners as a wedding and event venue, according to the suit.
When they inquired with LTD about using the property to host their wedding, a company representative responded, "We're so excited to have the opportunity to host you at our gorgeous estate and welcome you to the Living The Dream family. We are specialized into making your event amazing and unforgettable."
Convinced in part by the glamorous depictions of past weddings in the LTD brochure, the couple put down nearly $11,000 and signed an agreement in January to be married there in August, the suit states.
"Suffice to say, plaintiffs reasonably believed that they were entering into a contract that committed LTD defendants to hosting plaintiffs' wedding event at the property," the suit states.
"They sent out wedding invitations for friends and family, coordinated the necessary travel arrangements, booked vendors — including bartenders, caterers and a band — and relied on LTD's representation that 20 guests could stay overnight at the property for three nights."
But LTD notified the plaintiffs by email in July 2024, a month before they were to exchange vows, that they could not use the property after all due unforeseeable circumstances and that the company's decision was made "in adherence to the latest legal requirements and regulations," according to the suit.
Although LTD allegedly refused to give further explanation for the wedding's annulment, Los Angeles County had sent the company cease-and-desist orders dating back to 2021 disallowing them from hosting events at the property, according to the suit, which further alleges the information undermines LTD's claim of an unexpected turn of events.
Foley and Sanfilippo had to wait two weeks to get their deposit back, causing them further stress, and they have since learned on Yelp reviews that other couples who used LTD also were forced into late wedding cancellations, the suit states.
Trial of the lawsuit is scheduled Aug. 23, 2027.
City News Service